Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Massachusetts House

Massachusetts House District 14th Bristol

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Democrat is running · Adam J. Scanlon (D)

Massachusetts House District 14th Bristol: Decided: only a Democrat is runningMassachusetts House 1st Bristol: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president D+12Massachusetts House 2nd Bristol: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+11Massachusetts House 4th Bristol: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+6Massachusetts House 9th Norfolk: chance of a Democratic win 6%; 2024 president D+13Rhode Island House 52: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+9Massachusetts House District 14th Bristol: Decided: only a Democrat is running2nd Bristol1st Bristol9th Norfolk4th Bristol14th Bristol
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 14th Bristol is safe Democratic. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 3 favour Republicans. 1 of them is across the state line.

StatusDecided: only a Democrat is running
CandidatesAdam J. Scanlon (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberAdam Scanlon

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+12
President 2024D+10
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMassachusetts
Median household income$110,267$101,341
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)48%47%
Median age4240
White (not Hispanic)85%68%
Black2%7%
Hispanic4%13%
Asian5%7%
Born abroad9%18%
Jobs in manufacturing11%9%
Jobs in farming or mining0%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.