Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Maine House

Maine House District 86

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

28% chance of a Democratic win · Abigail Geer (D), Rolf Olsen Jr. (R)

Maine House District 86: ForecastMaine House 104: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+3Maine House 106: chance of a Democratic win 20%Maine House 80: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+24Maine House 84: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+20Maine House 85: chance of a Democratic win 6%; 2024 president R+7Maine House 87: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+16Maine House District 86: Forecast1068785104848086
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 86 leans Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 6 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win28%
Likely margin (80% range)R+16 to D+6, middle R+5
CandidatesAbigail Geer (D), Rolf Olsen Jr. (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberRolf Olsen

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+3
Governor 2022D+4
Legislature 2024R+4
President 2024R+2
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMaine
Median household income$78,067$71,773
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)41%35%
Median age4845
White (not Hispanic)89%91%
Black0%2%
Hispanic1%2%
Asian1%1%
Born abroad3%4%
Jobs in manufacturing9%9%
Jobs in farming or mining1%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.