Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Florida House

Florida House District 47

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Democrat is running · Anthony Nieves (D)

Florida House District 47: Decided: only a Democrat is runningFlorida House 35: chance of a Democratic win 38%; 2024 president R+1Florida House 44: chance of a Democratic win >99%Florida House 46: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+12Florida House District 47: Decided: only a Democrat is running44463547
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 47 is safe Democratic. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 1 is competitive.

StatusDecided: only a Democrat is running
CandidatesAnthony Nieves (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberPaula Stark

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+2
Governor 2022R+6
Legislature 2024R+2
President 2024R+2
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtFlorida
Median household income$73,923$71,711
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)29%33%
Median age3843
White (not Hispanic)25%51%
Black7%15%
Hispanic60%27%
Asian3%3%
Born abroad24%21%
Jobs in manufacturing4%5%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.