Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › California Assembly

California Assembly District 79

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

97% chance of a Democratic win · LaShae Sharp-Collins (D), Andrew Lawson (R)

California Assembly District 79: ForecastCalifornia Assembly 75: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+14California Assembly 78: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+38California Assembly 80: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+17California Assembly District 79: Forecast80787579
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 79 is safe Democratic. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win97%
Likely margin (80% range)D+18 to D+63, middle D+41
CandidatesLaShae Sharp-Collins (D), Andrew Lawson (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberLaShae Sharp-Collins

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+28
Governor 2022D+24
Legislature 2024uncontested (D)
President 2024D+23
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtCalifornia
Median household income$76,911$96,334
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)25%36%
Median age3538
White (not Hispanic)28%35%
Black11%5%
Hispanic42%40%
Asian12%15%
Born abroad27%27%
Jobs in manufacturing8%9%
Jobs in farming or mining0%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.