Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › California Assembly

California Assembly District 44

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

>99% chance of a Democratic win · Nicholas "Nick" Schultz (D), Carolyn Daniels (R)

California Assembly District 44: ForecastCalifornia Assembly 40: chance of a Democratic win 94%; 2024 president D+9California Assembly 41: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+22California Assembly 42: chance of a Democratic win 92%; 2024 president D+15California Assembly 43: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+31California Assembly 46: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+27California Assembly 51: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+54California Assembly 52: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+56California Assembly District 44: Forecast5243514640424144
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 44 is safe Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 7 favour Democrats.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win>99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+27 to D+49, middle D+37
CandidatesNicholas "Nick" Schultz (D), Carolyn Daniels (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberNick Schultz

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+43
Governor 2022D+39
Legislature 2024D+32
President 2024D+34
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtCalifornia
Median household income$97,840$96,334
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)50%36%
Median age4038
White (not Hispanic)58%35%
Black4%5%
Hispanic21%40%
Asian11%15%
Born abroad32%27%
Jobs in manufacturing5%9%
Jobs in farming or mining0%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.