FutureBallotU.S. election forecasts, with every number traced to its source

VA-5 · House

election-day forecast · ground-up model · as of 2026-10-02

Lean R
31%
Tom Perriello
Democrat
69%
John McGuire
Republican
Expected margin and its 90% range
R+40R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20D+40R+4.1
What moves this district (points of margin; blue toward the Democrat, red toward the Republican)
2024 presidential lean−4.2
Democrat's experience+3.0
2024 House lean−2.5
total outside/party money+0.9
asian share−0.5

The district, in brief

Virginia's 5th covers Southside Virginia, including the cities of Charlottesville, Danville and Lynchburg, on the map first used in 2022. The text calls it a strong Republican bastion that backed Republicans even amid double-digit statewide losses in 2025; the facts give a 2024 presidential baseline on these lines of -12.5 for the Democrat.

The incumbent is Republican John McGuire, a freshman who won the seat with 57.3% in 2024 after narrowly ousting Bob Good in a primary. He won this year's Republican primary with 84.2% over Melanie Lucero. Democrats nominated Tom Perriello, who held the seat from 2009 to 2011 and later served as special envoy for Sudan; he took the Democratic primary with 79.8% over Suzanne Krzyzanowski and Robert Tracinski, after seven other Democrats withdrew. An independent, Cooke Harvey, is also on the ballot. As of July 15, 2026 McGuire had raised $1,781,840 with $524,404 on hand, Perriello $2,140,402 with $1,511,291 on hand.

All four raters listed call the seat R: Decision Desk HQ (July 14, 2026), the Cook Political Report (September 25, 2026), Inside Elections (May 8, 2026) and Sabato's Crystal Ball (September 29, 2026). The DCCC has nonetheless put the district on its target list, and the text says predictors are hesitant to rate it safe because Perriello is outraising McGuire. McGuire has refused to debate Perriello. One poll is recorded: Expedition Strategies, a Democratic firm (July 29 – August 1, 2026, 602 LV), had McGuire 47%, Perriello 44%.

A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.

The facts, each beside its sentence

Incumbent
John McGuire (R)The incumbent is Republican John McGuire, who was elected with 57.3% of the vote in 2024.
Open seat
noThe incumbent is Republican John McGuire
Democratic nominee
Tom PerrielloDemocrats nominated former Congressman Tom Perriello, who held this seat for one term from 2009 to 2011.
Republican nominee
John McGuire*John McGuire, incumbent U.S. representative
Democrat's background
Former special envoy for Sudan (2024–2025); former U.S. representative for this seat (2009–2011)former special envoy for Sudan (2024–2025), former U.S. representative (2009–2011)
Republican's background
Freshman incumbent, won the seat in 2024 with 57.3% after narrowly ousting Bob Good in the primaryCongressman McGuire, a freshman member of the House, won this seat with 57.3% of the vote in the last election after narrowly ousting former Congressman Bob Good in a primary.
Last result
McGuire elected with 57.3% in 2024who was elected with 57.3% of the vote in 2024
Lines
Not redrawn; the text notes candidates who left for the 1st district after the redistricting was struck down*Salaam Bhatti, attorney (running in 1st district after redistricting struck down)
Primaries
McGuire won the Republican primary 84.2% (42,286 votes) to 15.8% over Melanie Lucero; Perriello won the Democratic primary with 79.8% (30,112) over Suzanne Krzyzanowski 14.5% and Robert Tracinski 5.7%; seven Democrats withdrew, including Shannon Taylor and Salaam Bhatti, who moved to the 1st district, and Mike Pruitt, who endorsed Perriellocandidate: John McGuire (Virginia politician) party: Republican Party (United States) votes: 42,286 percentage: 84.2
Raters
Decision Desk HQ: R (July 14, 2026); Cook: R (September 25, 2026); Inside Elections: R (May 8, 2026); Sabato's Crystal Ball: R (September 29, 2026)Decision Desk HQ R July 14, 2026 The Cook Political Report R September 25, 2026 Inside Elections R May 8, 2026 Sabato's Crystal Ball R September 29, 2026
Money
As of July 15, 2026: McGuire raised $1,781,840, spent $1,291,655, $524,404 on hand; Perriello raised $2,140,402, spent $629,110, $1,511,291 on hand| John McGuire (R) $1,781,840 $1,291,655 $524,404 | Tom Perriello (D) $2,140,402 $629,110 $1,511,291
Also
One district poll: Expedition Strategies (D), July 29 – August 1, 2026, 602 LV: McGuire 47%, Perriello 44%, undecided 9%Expedition Strategies (D) July 29 – August 1, 2026 602 (LV)
The DCCC has placed the district on its target list despite its Republican lean; the text says predictors are hesitant to rate it safe because Perriello is outraising McGuireThe race is expected to favor the freshman incumbent; however, predictors are hesitant to rate the seat as safe due to Perriello outraising McGuire.
McGuire has refused to debate Perriello unless Perriello apologizes for accusing him of insider tradingMcGuire has refused to debate Perriello.
The text describes the district as a strong Republican bastion that backed Republicans even amid double-digit statewide losses in 2025; a Perriello win would make him the fifth different representative in six cyclesIf Perriello pulls the upset, he would be the fifth different representative for this seat in the last six election cycles.
An independent, Cooke Harvey, a vocational therapist, is on the ballot====Declared==== *Cooke Harvey, vocational therapist
Albemarle County supervisor Mike Pruitt withdrew from the Democratic primary and endorsed Perriello*Mike Pruitt, Albemarle County supervisor (endorsed Perriello)

Not in the source: The text gives no presidential result for the district.; The one poll is on the page but not in the model, whose basis says no district polls; it is from a Democratic firm.; Perriello's raised total is $2,140,401 in the Democratic primary table (as of July 22, 2026) and $2,140,402 in the general-election table (as of July 15, 2026); the general table is used here.; No ratings finer than R are given (no Lean/Likely/Safe).

Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as c1a7fb5c3c14; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.

Who holds the seat now

John J. McGuire III (Republican), in this chamber since 2025, 1 term. Committees: House Committee on Armed Services; House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.

How it has voted for president

Two-party margin201620202024
PresidentR+11.7R+8.2R+12.2

A shift of 0.5 points toward the Republicans from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.

Who are the voters?

Group (adults 25+)Share of adultsTurnout 2020 / midtermShare of a midterm electorateEst. Democratic share, 2020
White, no degree45%65% / 46%41%16%
White, degree27%89% / 71%38%57%
Black21%58% / 41%17%94%
Hispanic3%32% / 21%1%56%
Asian2%49% / 28%1%72%
Other / multiracial2%66% / 49%2%63%

Of about 548,445 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 45.8% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 46.4% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 1.1 points toward Democrats. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.

Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.

The money

CandidateRaisedCash on handPAC shareSelf-fundedOutside $ forOutside $ against
Perriello, Thomas (DEM)
challenger
$2,140,402$1,511,2915%1%$452$0
Mcguire, John J. Mr. Iii (REP)
challenger
$1,781,840$524,34623%0%$0$0
Pruitt, Mike (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$433,147$63,4010%0%$0$0
Stichel, Adele (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$105,238$00%0%$0$0
Lucero, Melanie Virginia (REP)
challenger · not on our roster
$99,951$00%50%$0$0
Tracinski, Robert William (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$54,103$17,5290%0%$0$0
Zabriskie, Kathryn (Kate) Ms. (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$47,156$00%71%$0$0
Good, Robert G. Hon. (REP)
challenger · not on our roster
$44,968$6,46342%22%$0$0
Krzyzanowski, Suzanne K (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$16,897$6,3780%30%$0$0
Riley, Paul (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$3,245$00%0%$0$0
Hurt, Robert (REP)
incumbent · not on our roster
$6$13,5270%0%$0$0

FEC bulk candidate summaries through September 10, 2026; $452 of independent expenditures for or against these candidates this cycle (FEC Schedule E, types 24E and 24A), which is the parties' and outside groups' own revealed view of whether this seat is in play.

The district in numbers

MeasureDistrictNationDifference
Bachelor's degree or higher, 25+33.5%34.9%-1.5 pts
White, non-Hispanic69.1%58.2%+10.9 pts
Black, non-Hispanic20.3%12.0%+8.3 pts
Hispanic or Latino4.4%19.0%-14.6 pts
Asian, non-Hispanic2.0%5.8%-3.8 pts
Foreign-born4.6%13.9%-9.3 pts
Median age41.539.22.3
Median household income$70,085$84,362$-14,277
Median home value$253,500$379,737$-126,237
Owner-occupied homes70.0%65.1%+4.9 pts
Unemployment, July 2026 (BLS county data)4.0%4.4%-0.4 pts
Change in unemployment, past 12 months+0.2 pts——
Change since the last election (24 months)+0.3 pts——
Unemployment (ACS)4.0%5.2%-1.2 pts
Federal government workers2.2%2.6%-0.4 pts
Work from home12.6%13.5%-0.9 pts
Households on SNAP11.8%11.8%+0.0 pts
Households with Social Security income37.5%31.2%+6.3 pts
Households with public assistance income3.8%2.7%+1.1 pts
Moved in from another state, past year2.6%2.3%+0.3 pts
Gini index0.500.440.06
Per-capita personal income (BEA), 2024$67,734$73,248$-5,514
Per-capita income growth since 2019, nominal, 202436.7%32.0%+4.8 pts
Government and other transfers, share of income, 202422.7%19.6%+3.1 pts
Social Security, share of income, 20227.7%5.8%+1.8 pts
Medicare, share of income, 20224.9%4.5%+0.5 pts
Medicaid, share of income, 20225.3%4.0%+1.3 pts
SNAP, share of income, 20220.7%0.6%+0.0 pts
Earned Income Tax Credit, share of income, 20220.4%0.4%-0.0 pts
Veterans' benefits, share of income, 20220.9%0.9%-0.0 pts
Federal civilian jobs, share of all jobs, 20220.6%1.3%-0.7 pts
Military jobs, share of all jobs, 20220.6%0.9%-0.3 pts

ACS 5-year 2023, the Census Bureau's own tabulation of this district (118th Congress lines). Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.

Who is favoured, and by how much?

69%
John McGuire
run 6f211e6f · house_district_prior/0.2.0 · as of 2026-10-02
-4.1
expected margin, D-R
run 6f211e6f · house_district_prior/0.2.0 · as of 2026-10-02

The 90% interval runs from -17.7 to +9.8 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.

What is this built on?

A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.

Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.

Why does the model say this?

Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: 2024 presidential lean (R+11.0): 4.2 pts toward the Republican; Democrat's experience (statewide or former federal office): 3.0 pts toward the Democrat; 2024 House lean (R+12.4): 2.5 pts toward the Republican; total outside/party money: 0.9 pts toward the Democrat; asian share (2.0%): 0.5 pts toward the Republican.

How sure is it, and of what?

Total sd 8.34 points, made of the seat's own volatility 90%, correlated polling error 10%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.

Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.

How was this number made?

Run 6f211e6f-2bdc-4dda-8f72-81fc628dab0b, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).