Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Wyoming Senate

Wyoming Senate District 5

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

5% chance of a Democratic win · Lauren Schoenfeld (R), Theodore Hanlon (D)

Wyoming Senate District 5: ForecastColorado Senate 1: chance of a Democratic win 5%Colorado Senate 15: chance of a Democratic win 85%Wyoming Senate 10: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+3Wyoming Senate 31: chance of a Democratic win 4%Wyoming Senate 4: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+30Wyoming Senate 6: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+54Wyoming Senate 7: chance of a Democratic win 7%Wyoming Senate 8: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+24Wyoming Senate District 5: Forecast31CO 15610CO 15
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 5 is safe Republican. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 7 favour Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win5%
Likely margin (80% range)R+55 to R+9, middle R+32
CandidatesLauren Schoenfeld (R), Theodore Hanlon (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberLynn Hutchings

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022no two-party contest; won by Lynn Hutchings (independent or nonpartisan)
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtWyoming
Median household income$71,236$74,815
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)28%30%
Median age3539
White (not Hispanic)73%82%
Black1%1%
Hispanic19%10%
Asian1%1%
Born abroad6%4%
Jobs in manufacturing2%4%
Jobs in farming or mining2%10%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.