Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Wisconsin Assembly

Wisconsin Assembly District 40

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

96% chance of a Democratic win · Karen DeSanto (D), Julie Helmer (R)

Wisconsin Assembly District 40: ForecastWisconsin Assembly 39: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+34Wisconsin Assembly 41: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+18Wisconsin Assembly 42: chance of a Democratic win 97%; 2024 president D+15Wisconsin Assembly 51: chance of a Democratic win 35%; 2024 president D+4Wisconsin Assembly 81: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+39Wisconsin Assembly District 40: Forecast814241395140
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 40 is safe Democratic. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans, 1 is competitive.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win96%
Likely margin (80% range)D+4 to D+27, middle D+15
CandidatesKaren DeSanto (D), Julie Helmer (R)
Candidate list fromwikipedia
Current memberKaren DeSanto

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+8
President 2024D+5
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtWisconsin
Median household income$70,451$75,670
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)20%33%
Median age4540
White (not Hispanic)92%79%
Black1%6%
Hispanic4%8%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad1%5%
Jobs in manufacturing29%18%
Jobs in farming or mining3%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.