Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Vermont House

Vermont House District Rutland-9

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

32% chance of a Democratic win · Jeff Haylon (D), Aida Nielsen (R)

Vermont House District Rutland-9: ForecastVermont House Addison-2: chance of a Democratic win 95%; 2024 president D+41Vermont House Addison-Rutland: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president D+20Vermont House Rutland-11: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president D+18Vermont House Rutland-8: chance of a Democratic win 89%; 2024 president D+6Vermont House District Rutland-9: ForecastAddison-2Rutland-11Rutland-9
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District Rutland-9 leans Republican. Of its 4 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win32%
Likely margin (80% range)R+15 to D+7, middle R+4
CandidatesJeff Haylon (D), Aida Nielsen (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberTodd Nielsen

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+9
President 2024D+10
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtVermont
Median household income$56,115$78,024
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)31%43%
Median age5043
White (not Hispanic)93%91%
Black1%1%
Hispanic0%2%
Asian1%2%
Born abroad2%4%
Jobs in manufacturing10%10%
Jobs in farming or mining4%3%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.