Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Vermont House

Vermont House District Grand Isle-Chittenden

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

6% chance of a Democratic win · Josie Henry (R), Sylvia Jensen (D), Michael R. Morgan (R), Dave Skinner (D)

Vermont House District Grand Isle-Chittenden: Elects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.1New York Assembly 115: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president evenVermont House Chittenden-19: chance of a Democratic win >99%Vermont House Chittenden-20: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+52Vermont House Chittenden-Franklin: chance of a Democratic win 5%Vermont House Franklin-1: chance of a Democratic win 95%; 2024 president D+13Vermont House Franklin-2: chance of a Democratic win 93%Vermont House Franklin-4: chance of a Democratic win 90%; 2024 president R+1Vermont House District Grand Isle-Chittenden: Elects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.1Chittenden-FranklinChittenden-19Franklin-1Franklin-4NY 115Grand Isle-Chittenden
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District Grand Isle-Chittenden is likely Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 6 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans. 1 of them is across the state line.

StatusElects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.1
Chance of a Democratic win6%
Likely margin (80% range)R+31 to R+9, middle R+20
CandidatesJosie Henry (R), Sylvia Jensen (D), Michael R. Morgan (R), Dave Skinner (D)
Candidate list fromofficial

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+22
President 2024D+22
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtVermont
Median household income$97,599$78,024
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)43%43%
Median age4743
White (not Hispanic)92%91%
Black0%1%
Hispanic2%2%
Asian0%2%
Born abroad4%4%
Jobs in manufacturing10%10%
Jobs in farming or mining3%3%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.