Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Utah Senate

Utah Senate District 1

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

4% chance of a Democratic win · Claudia Bigler (D), Scott Sandall (R), Julie Quinlan (Forward)

Utah Senate District 1: ForecastIdaho Senate 27: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+69Nevada Senate 19: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+31Utah Senate 10: not up in 2026 (held by democrat); 2024 president D+13Utah Senate 11: chance of a Democratic win <1%Utah Senate 2: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+36Utah Senate 3: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+10Utah Senate 4: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+32Utah Senate 6: chance of a Democratic win 6%Utah Senate District 1: Forecast632ID 2711NV 191
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 1 is safe Republican. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 7 favour Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win4%
Likely margin (80% range)R+58 to R+11, middle R+35
CandidatesClaudia Bigler (D), Scott Sandall (R), Julie Quinlan (Forward)
Candidate list fromofficial (archive copy)
Current memberScott Sandall

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (R)
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtUtah
Median household income$89,179$91,750
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)29%37%
Median age3232
White (not Hispanic)84%76%
Black0%1%
Hispanic11%15%
Asian1%2%
Born abroad4%9%
Jobs in manufacturing18%10%
Jobs in farming or mining3%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.