Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Oklahoma House

Oklahoma House District 59

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Republican is running · Mike Dobrinski (R)

Oklahoma House District 59: Decided: only a Republican is runningOklahoma House 38: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+55Oklahoma House 40: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 41: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+39Oklahoma House 55: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 57: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 58: chance of a Democratic win 5%Oklahoma House 61: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House District 59: Decided: only a Republican is running4041555738586159
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 59 is safe Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 7 favour Republicans.

StatusDecided: only a Republican is running
CandidatesMike Dobrinski (R)
Candidate list fromnews guide + filing book
Current memberMike Dobrinski

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtOklahoma
Median household income$68,894$63,603
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)21%28%
Median age3737
White (not Hispanic)75%63%
Black2%7%
Hispanic15%12%
Asian0%2%
Born abroad6%6%
Jobs in manufacturing8%9%
Jobs in farming or mining14%4%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.