Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Oklahoma House

Oklahoma House District 22

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Republican is running · Ryan Eaves (R)

Oklahoma House District 22: Decided: only a Republican is runningOklahoma House 17: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 18: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 19: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 21: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 25: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 42: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 48: chance of a Democratic win <1%Oklahoma House 49: chance of a Democratic win 4%Oklahoma House District 22: Decided: only a Republican is running212548424917181922
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 22 is safe Republican. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 8 favour Republicans.

StatusDecided: only a Republican is running
CandidatesRyan Eaves (R)
Candidate list fromnews guide + filing book
Current memberRyan Eaves

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtOklahoma
Median household income$54,606$63,603
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)18%28%
Median age4037
White (not Hispanic)67%63%
Black2%7%
Hispanic6%12%
Asian0%2%
Born abroad2%6%
Jobs in manufacturing9%9%
Jobs in farming or mining7%4%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.