Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Dakota House

North Dakota House District 31

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Dawson Holle (R), Karen Rohr (R), Tim Spilman (D), Rissa M Williams (D)

North Dakota House District 31: Elects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.0North Dakota House 30: not up in 2026 (held by republican, republican); 2024 president R+43North Dakota House 33: chance of a Democratic win 7%North Dakota House 34: not up in 2026 (held by republican, republican); 2024 president R+51North Dakota House 35: chance of a Democratic win 6%North Dakota House 36: not up in 2026 (held by republican, republican); 2024 president R+67North Dakota House 39: chance of a Democratic win 6%North Dakota House 47: chance of a Democratic win 11%North Dakota House 8: not up in 2026 (held by republican, republican); 2024 president R+53South Dakota House 28A: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president R+10North Dakota House District 31: Elects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.0303683339SD 28A31
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 31 is safe Republican. Of its 9 neighbouring districts, 9 favour Republicans. 1 of them is across the state line.

StatusElects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.0
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+49 to R+27, middle R+38
CandidatesDawson Holle (R), Karen Rohr (R), Tim Spilman (D), Rissa M Williams (D)
Candidate list fromwikipedia

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+66
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Dakota
Median household income$69,161$75,949
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)26%32%
Median age3936
White (not Hispanic)69%83%
Black1%3%
Hispanic2%4%
Asian0%2%
Born abroad1%4%
Jobs in manufacturing2%7%
Jobs in farming or mining12%8%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.