Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Dakota House

North Dakota House District 13

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

7% chance of a Democratic win · Austen Schauer (R), Jim Jonas (R), Maggi Gadaire (D), Brenda Jo Gillund (D)

North Dakota House District 13: Elects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.1North Dakota House 10: not up in 2026 (held by republican, republican); 2024 president R+4North Dakota House 16: not up in 2026 (held by republican, republican); 2024 president R+12North Dakota House 21: chance of a Democratic win >99%North Dakota House 22: not up in 2026 (held by republican, republican); 2024 president R+19North Dakota House 45: chance of a Democratic win 7%North Dakota House District 13: Elects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.121452213
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 13 is likely Republican. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 4 favour Republicans.

StatusElects 2: expected Democratic seats 0.1
Chance of a Democratic win7%
Likely margin (80% range)R+55 to R+9, middle R+33
CandidatesAusten Schauer (R), Jim Jonas (R), Maggi Gadaire (D), Brenda Jo Gillund (D)
Candidate list fromwikipedia

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (R)
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Dakota
Median household income$82,446$75,949
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)36%32%
Median age4036
White (not Hispanic)89%83%
Black3%3%
Hispanic2%4%
Asian1%2%
Born abroad4%4%
Jobs in manufacturing9%7%
Jobs in farming or mining2%8%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.