Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Montana Senate

Montana Senate District 33

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Not up in 2026 (held by Democrat)

Montana Senate District 33: Not up in 2026 (held by Democrat)Montana Senate 29: chance of a Democratic win 77%Montana Senate 31: chance of a Democratic win 95%Montana Senate 32: chance of a Democratic win 91%Montana Senate 34: chance of a Democratic win 1%Montana Senate 39: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+45Montana Senate District 33: Not up in 2026 (held by Democrat)32293933
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 33 is not up in 2026 (held by a Democrat). Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusNot up in 2026 (held by Democrat)
Current memberChris Pope

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+13
President 2024D+6
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMontana
Median household income$82,591$69,922
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)59%35%
Median age3140
White (not Hispanic)87%84%
Black0%0%
Hispanic6%4%
Asian1%1%
Born abroad5%2%
Jobs in manufacturing8%5%
Jobs in farming or mining2%6%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.