Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Montana Senate

Montana Senate District 28

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

5% chance of a Democratic win · Forrest J Mandeville (R), Kelly Hale (D)

Montana Senate District 28: ForecastMontana Senate 19: chance of a Democratic win <1%Montana Senate 21: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+21Montana Senate 27: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+37Montana Senate 29: chance of a Democratic win 77%Montana Senate 39: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+45Wyoming Senate 18: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+60Wyoming Senate 19: chance of a Democratic win <1%Montana Senate District 28: Forecast27WY 1929WY 1821193928
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 28 is safe Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 6 favour Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win5%
Likely margin (80% range)R+56 to R+10, middle R+33
CandidatesForrest J Mandeville (R), Kelly Hale (D)
Candidate list fromnews guide
Current memberForrest Mandeville

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMontana
Median household income$75,984$69,922
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)22%35%
Median age3840
White (not Hispanic)85%84%
Black0%0%
Hispanic6%4%
Asian1%1%
Born abroad1%2%
Jobs in manufacturing8%5%
Jobs in farming or mining5%6%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.