Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Montana Senate

Montana Senate District 1

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Steve Gunderson (R), Jonathan Russell Jameson (D)

Montana Senate District 1: Forecast (lines redrawn; start rebuilt from 2024 votes)Idaho Senate 1: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+48Montana Senate 2: not up in 2026 (held by democrat); 2024 president R+17Montana Senate 3: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+42Montana Senate 5: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+46Montana Senate 6: chance of a Democratic win 4%Montana Senate 7: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+37Montana Senate District 1: Forecast (lines redrawn; start rebuilt from 2024 votes)53627ID 11
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 1 is safe Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 5 favour Republicans. 1 of them is across the state line.

StatusForecast (lines redrawn; start rebuilt from 2024 votes)
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+61 to R+33, middle R+47
CandidatesSteve Gunderson (R), Jonathan Russell Jameson (D)
Candidate list fromnews guide
Current memberMike Cuffe
Linesredrawn since the last election; Census figures below are on the earlier lines

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMontana
Median household income$47,018$69,922
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)18%35%
Median age5340
White (not Hispanic)91%84%
Black0%0%
Hispanic3%4%
Asian0%1%
Born abroad3%2%
Jobs in manufacturing6%5%
Jobs in farming or mining9%6%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.