Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Montana House

Montana House District 92

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Democrat is running · Monica Tranel (D)

Montana House District 92: Decided: only a Democrat is runningMontana House 100: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+56Montana House 15: chance of a Democratic win 90%; 2024 president D+7Montana House 76: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+47Montana House 91: chance of a Democratic win 96%; 2024 president D+3Montana House 93: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+25Montana House 95: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+65Montana House 99: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+12Montana House District 92: Decided: only a Democrat is running999391157692
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 92 is safe Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 6 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans.

StatusDecided: only a Democrat is running
CandidatesMonica Tranel (D)
Candidate list fromnews guide
Current memberConnie Keogh

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+22
President 2024D+20
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMontana
Median household income$66,757$69,922
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)31%35%
Median age4540
White (not Hispanic)84%84%
Black0%0%
Hispanic4%4%
Asian1%1%
Born abroad3%2%
Jobs in manufacturing9%5%
Jobs in farming or mining4%6%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.