Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Montana House

Montana House District 73

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

>99% chance of a Democratic win · Gerry Kennedy (R), Jennifer Lynch (D)

Montana House District 73: ForecastMontana House 71: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president evenMontana House 72: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+13Montana House 74: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+10Montana House District 73: Forecast747173
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 73 is safe Democratic. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win>99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+18 to D+40, middle D+29
CandidatesGerry Kennedy (R), Jennifer Lynch (D)
Candidate list fromnews guide
Current memberJennifer Lynch

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+23
President 2024D+7
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMontana
Median household income$57,362$69,922
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)22%35%
Median age4340
White (not Hispanic)91%84%
Black0%0%
Hispanic5%4%
Asian0%1%
Born abroad1%2%
Jobs in manufacturing5%5%
Jobs in farming or mining5%6%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.