Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Montana House

Montana House District 39

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

1% chance of a Democratic win · Kerri Seekins Crowe (R), Melissa Smith (D)

Montana House District 39: ForecastMontana House 40: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+49Montana House 43: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+25Montana House 44: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president R+37Montana House 45: chance of a Democratic win 93%; 2024 president D+4Montana House 47: chance of a Democratic win 93%; 2024 president D+7Montana House District 39: Forecast454347404439
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 39 is safe Republican. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 3 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+36 to R+14, middle R+25
CandidatesKerri Seekins Crowe (R), Melissa Smith (D)
Candidate list fromnews guide
Current memberKerri Seekins-Crowe

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+32
President 2024R+35
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMontana
Median household income$70,727$69,922
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)22%35%
Median age4040
White (not Hispanic)88%84%
Black0%0%
Hispanic5%4%
Asian1%1%
Born abroad2%2%
Jobs in manufacturing3%5%
Jobs in farming or mining16%6%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.