Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Massachusetts Senate

Massachusetts Senate District Worcester and Hampshire

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

4% chance of a Democratic win · Shannon M. Teabo (D), Peter J. Durant (R)

Massachusetts Senate District Worcester and Hampshire: ForecastMassachusetts Senate First Worcester: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+16Massachusetts Senate Hampden, Hampshire and Worcester: chance of a Democratic win >99%Massachusetts Senate Hampshire, Franklin and Worcester: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+34Massachusetts Senate Second Worcester: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+10Massachusetts Senate Worcester and Hampden: chance of a Democratic win <1%Massachusetts Senate Worcester and Middlesex: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+11Massachusetts Senate District Worcester and Hampshire: ForecastSecond WorcesterHampden, Hampshire and WorcesterWorcester and HampdenHampshire, Franklin and WorcesterWorcester and Hampshire
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District Worcester and Hampshire is safe Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win4%
Likely margin (80% range)R+56 to R+10, middle R+33
CandidatesShannon M. Teabo (D), Peter J. Durant (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberPeter Durant

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMassachusetts
Median household income$94,048$101,341
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)35%47%
Median age4440
White (not Hispanic)84%68%
Black3%7%
Hispanic7%13%
Asian2%7%
Born abroad7%18%
Jobs in manufacturing11%9%
Jobs in farming or mining1%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.