Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Massachusetts Senate

Massachusetts Senate District Bristol and Norfolk

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Democrat is running · Paul Richard Feeney (D)

Massachusetts Senate District Bristol and Norfolk: Decided: only a Democrat is runningMassachusetts Senate Norfolk and Suffolk: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+34Massachusetts Senate Norfolk, Plymouth and Bristol: chance of a Democratic win >99%Massachusetts Senate Norfolk, Worcester and Middlesex: chance of a Democratic win >99%Massachusetts Senate Third Bristol and Plymouth: chance of a Democratic win <1%Rhode Island Senate 19: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+9Rhode Island Senate 8: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+26Massachusetts Senate District Bristol and Norfolk: Decided: only a Democrat is runningRI 8RI 19Norfolk and SuffolkNorfolk, Worcester and MiddlesexThird Bristol and PlymouthBristol and Norfolk
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District Bristol and Norfolk is safe Democratic. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusDecided: only a Democrat is running
CandidatesPaul Richard Feeney (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberPaul Feeney

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024no two-party contest; won by Paul R Feeney (Democrat)
President 2024D+19
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMassachusetts
Median household income$114,989$101,341
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)51%47%
Median age4140
White (not Hispanic)79%68%
Black5%7%
Hispanic5%13%
Asian7%7%
Born abroad12%18%
Jobs in manufacturing10%9%
Jobs in farming or mining0%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.