Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Maine House

Maine House District 119

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

>99% chance of a Democratic win · Michael Dixon (D), Jacob Wakem (R)

Maine House District 119: ForecastMaine House 110: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+44Maine House 111: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+42Maine House 114: chance of a Democratic win >99%Maine House 117: chance of a Democratic win >99%Maine House 118: chance of a Democratic win >99%Maine House 122: chance of a Democratic win >99%Maine House 123: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+58Maine House District 119: Forecast122114111123110119
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 119 is safe Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 7 favour Democrats.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win>99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+55 to D+77, middle D+66
CandidatesMichael Dixon (D), Jacob Wakem (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberCharles Skold

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+75
Legislature 2024D+70
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMaine
Median household income$73,724$71,773
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)61%35%
Median age4145
White (not Hispanic)83%91%
Black7%2%
Hispanic4%2%
Asian1%1%
Born abroad8%4%
Jobs in manufacturing10%9%
Jobs in farming or mining1%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.