Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Maine House

Maine House District 11

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Keith Newman (D), Tiffany Strout (R)

Maine House District 11: ForecastMaine House 10: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+25Maine House 12: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+7Maine House 18: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+26Maine House District 11: Forecast12101811
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 11 is safe Republican. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+48 to R+25, middle R+37
CandidatesKeith Newman (D), Tiffany Strout (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberTiffany Strout

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+36
Governor 2022R+23
Legislature 2024R+39
President 2024R+30
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMaine
Median household income$50,875$71,773
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)24%35%
Median age4845
White (not Hispanic)90%91%
Black1%2%
Hispanic3%2%
Asian0%1%
Born abroad2%4%
Jobs in manufacturing7%9%
Jobs in farming or mining17%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.