Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Iowa House

Iowa House District 69

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

6% chance of a Democratic win · Tom Determann (R), Randy Meier (D)

Iowa House District 69: ForecastIowa House 66: chance of a Democratic win 11%; 2024 president R+32Iowa House 70: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+29Illinois House 73: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+25Illinois House 89: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+30Iowa House District 69: Forecast7066IL 73IL 8969
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 69 is likely Republican. Of its 4 neighbouring districts, 4 favour Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win6%
Likely margin (80% range)R+25 to R+3, middle R+14
CandidatesTom Determann (R), Randy Meier (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberTom Determann

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+11
Governor 2022R+23
Legislature 2024R+14
President 2024R+13
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtIowa
Median household income$61,370$73,147
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)21%31%
Median age4339
White (not Hispanic)88%83%
Black4%4%
Hispanic4%7%
Asian0%2%
Born abroad2%6%
Jobs in manufacturing21%15%
Jobs in farming or mining2%4%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.