Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Indiana Senate

Indiana Senate District 48

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Bradley (Brad) Hochgesang (D), Daryl Schmitt (R)

Indiana Senate District 48: ForecastIllinois Senate 58: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+36Indiana Senate 39: chance of a Democratic win <1%Indiana Senate 44: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+48Indiana Senate 47: chance of a Democratic win <1%Indiana Senate 49: chance of a Democratic win 4%Indiana Senate 50: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+19Kentucky Senate 5: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+60Kentucky Senate 8: chance of a Democratic win 5%Indiana Senate District 48: Forecast5049KY 84744KY 539IL 5848
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 48 is safe Republican. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 8 favour Republicans. 3 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+63 to R+40, middle R+51
CandidatesBradley (Brad) Hochgesang (D), Daryl Schmitt (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberDaryl Schmitt

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+56
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtIndiana
Median household income$67,014$70,051
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)20%29%
Median age4138
White (not Hispanic)91%76%
Black1%9%
Hispanic4%8%
Asian0%3%
Born abroad3%6%
Jobs in manufacturing29%18%
Jobs in farming or mining4%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.