Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Indiana House

Indiana House District 39

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

20% chance of a Democratic win · Lindsay Gramlich (D), Danny Lopez (R)

Indiana House District 39: ForecastIndiana House 24: chance of a Democratic win 9%; 2024 president R+8Indiana House 29: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+17Indiana House 32: chance of a Democratic win 90%; 2024 president D+9Indiana House District 39: Forecast32292439
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 39 leans Republican. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win20%
Likely margin (80% range)R+19 to D+4, middle R+7
CandidatesLindsay Gramlich (D), Danny Lopez (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberDanny Lopez

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+5
Legislature 2024R+7
President 2024even
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtIndiana
Median household income$124,671$70,051
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)71%29%
Median age4038
White (not Hispanic)79%76%
Black3%9%
Hispanic6%8%
Asian8%3%
Born abroad11%6%
Jobs in manufacturing11%18%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.