Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Indiana House

Indiana House District 38

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Nate Stout (D), Heath R. VanNatter (R)

Indiana House District 38: ForecastIndiana House 13: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+41Indiana House 16: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+50Indiana House 23: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+50Indiana House 24: chance of a Democratic win 9%; 2024 president R+8Indiana House 26: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+24Indiana House 27: chance of a Democratic win 97%Indiana House 30: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+33Indiana House 31: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+43Indiana House 35: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+39Indiana House 37: chance of a Democratic win 6%; 2024 president R+12Indiana House 41: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+40Indiana House District 38: Forecast272637243035314123161338
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 38 is safe Republican. Of its 11 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 9 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+56 to R+33, middle R+44
CandidatesNate Stout (D), Heath R. VanNatter (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberHeath VanNatter

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (R)
Legislature 2024R+48
President 2024R+48
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtIndiana
Median household income$79,801$70,051
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)25%29%
Median age4338
White (not Hispanic)91%76%
Black1%9%
Hispanic5%8%
Asian0%3%
Born abroad2%6%
Jobs in manufacturing24%18%
Jobs in farming or mining3%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.