Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Illinois Senate

Illinois Senate District 56

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

47% chance of a Democratic win · Erica Harriss (R), Marsia Geldert-Murphey (D)

Illinois Senate District 56: ForecastIllinois Senate 50: chance of a Democratic win <1%Illinois Senate 55: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+20Illinois Senate 57: chance of a Democratic win 99%Missouri Senate 13: not up in 2026 (held by democrat); 2024 president D+49Missouri Senate 23: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+17Missouri Senate 5: not up in 2026 (held by democrat); 2024 president D+66Illinois Senate District 56: ForecastMO 2357555056
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 56 is competitive. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 3 favour Republicans. 3 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win47%
Likely margin (80% range)R+12 to D+11, middle R+1
CandidatesErica Harriss (R), Marsia Geldert-Murphey (D)
Candidate list fromwikipedia primary results
Current memberErica Harriss

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+2
Governor 2022R+4
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtIllinois
Median household income$69,892$81,702
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)30%37%
Median age3939
White (not Hispanic)76%59%
Black12%14%
Hispanic6%18%
Asian1%6%
Born abroad3%14%
Jobs in manufacturing11%12%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.