Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Hawaii Senate

Hawaii Senate District 19

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

97% chance of a Democratic win · Rachele Lamosao (D), Elijah Pierick (R)

Hawaii Senate District 19: ForecastHawaii Senate 15: chance of a Democratic win >99%Hawaii Senate 16: not up in 2026 (held by democrat); 2024 president D+25Hawaii Senate 17: chance of a Democratic win >99%Hawaii Senate 18: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+21Hawaii Senate 20: chance of a Democratic win 7%Hawaii Senate 21: chance of a Democratic win >99%Hawaii Senate District 19: Forecast16182021171519
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 19 is safe Democratic. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win97%
Likely margin (80% range)D+13 to D+60, middle D+37
CandidatesRachele Lamosao (D), Elijah Pierick (R)
Candidate list fromnews guide
Current memberRachele Lamosao

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtHawaii
Median household income$101,126$98,317
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)23%35%
Median age3841
White (not Hispanic)5%21%
Black1%2%
Hispanic8%10%
Asian61%37%
Born abroad34%18%
Jobs in manufacturing3%3%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.