Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Hawaii House

Hawaii House District 7

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Democrat is running · Nicole Lowen (D)

Hawaii House District 7: Decided: only a Democrat is runningHawaii House 1: chance of a Democratic win >99%Hawaii House 5: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+31Hawaii House 6: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+27Hawaii House 8: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+33Hawaii House District 7: Decided: only a Democrat is running68157
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 7 is safe Democratic. Of its 4 neighbouring districts, 4 favour Democrats.

StatusDecided: only a Democrat is running
CandidatesNicole Lowen (D)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberNicole Lowen

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+11
President 2024D+21
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtHawaii
Median household income$100,065$98,317
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)30%35%
Median age4141
White (not Hispanic)36%21%
Black1%2%
Hispanic7%10%
Asian15%37%
Born abroad13%18%
Jobs in manufacturing2%3%
Jobs in farming or mining2%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.