Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Hawaii House

Hawaii House District 47

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

99% chance of a Democratic win · Sean Quinlan (D), Mark Talaeai (R)

Hawaii House District 47: ForecastHawaii House 38: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president D+21Hawaii House 46: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+12Hawaii House 48: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+24Hawaii House District 47: Forecast38484647
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 47 is safe Democratic. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+10 to D+33, middle D+21
CandidatesSean Quinlan (D), Mark Talaeai (R)
Candidate list fromnews guide
Current memberSean Quinlan

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+15
President 2024D+7
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtHawaii
Median household income$91,618$98,317
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)30%35%
Median age3241
White (not Hispanic)32%21%
Black3%2%
Hispanic9%10%
Asian14%37%
Born abroad14%18%
Jobs in manufacturing2%3%
Jobs in farming or mining3%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.