Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Georgia House

Georgia House District 138

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

2% chance of a Democratic win · Vance Smith (R), Cyndie Hutchings (D)

Georgia House District 138: ForecastAlabama House 37: chance of a Democratic win 7%Alabama House 38: chance of a Democratic win 5%Alabama House 80: chance of a Democratic win 5%Georgia House 136: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+36Georgia House 137: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+17Georgia House 139: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+20Georgia House 140: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+47Georgia House 72: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+47Georgia House District 138: ForecastAL 80139AL 3872136137AL 37138
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 138 is safe Republican. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 6 favour Republicans. 3 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win2%
Likely margin (80% range)R+66 to R+20, middle R+43
CandidatesVance Smith (R), Cyndie Hutchings (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberVance Smith

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024uncontested (R)
President 2024R+41
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtGeorgia
Median household income$79,950$74,664
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)35%34%
Median age4237
White (not Hispanic)72%50%
Black19%31%
Hispanic4%11%
Asian1%4%
Born abroad3%11%
Jobs in manufacturing14%10%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.