Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Georgia House

Georgia House District 127

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

3% chance of a Democratic win · Mark Newton (R), Channing Von-T Taylor (D)

Georgia House District 127: ForecastGeorgia House 125: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+24Georgia House 129: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+33Georgia House 131: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+26Georgia House 132: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+38South Carolina House 12: chance of a Democratic win 30%; 2024 president R+4South Carolina House 83: chance of a Democratic win 5%; 2024 president R+38Georgia House District 127: ForecastSC 83125SC 12132127
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 127 is safe Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 4 favour Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win3%
Likely margin (80% range)R+61 to R+15, middle R+38
CandidatesMark Newton (R), Channing Von-T Taylor (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberMark Newton

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024uncontested (R)
President 2024R+26
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtGeorgia
Median household income$81,840$74,664
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)43%34%
Median age4137
White (not Hispanic)69%50%
Black14%31%
Hispanic7%11%
Asian6%4%
Born abroad9%11%
Jobs in manufacturing7%10%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.