Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Connecticut Senate

Connecticut Senate District 30

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

28% chance of a Democratic win · Aaron Zimmer (D), Stephen G. Harding (R)

Connecticut Senate District 30: ForecastConnecticut Senate 24: chance of a Democratic win 96%; 2024 president D+8Connecticut Senate 31: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president R+8Connecticut Senate 32: chance of a Democratic win 10%; 2024 president R+9Connecticut Senate 8: chance of a Democratic win 87%; 2024 president D+10Massachusetts Senate Berkshire, Hampden, Franklin and Hampshire: chance of a Democratic win >99%New York Senate 39: chance of a Democratic win 52%; 2024 president D+6New York Senate 40: chance of a Democratic win 96%; 2024 president D+11New York Senate 41: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+13Connecticut Senate District 30: Forecast2431328NY 40NY 39MA Berkshire, Hampden, Franklin and HampshireNY 4130
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 30 leans Republican. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans, 1 is competitive. 4 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win28%
Likely margin (80% range)R+16 to D+6, middle R+5
CandidatesAaron Zimmer (D), Stephen G. Harding (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberStephen Harding

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+8
Governor 2022even
Legislature 2024R+7
President 2024D+1
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtConnecticut
Median household income$100,644$93,760
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)43%42%
Median age4741
White (not Hispanic)80%63%
Black3%10%
Hispanic10%18%
Asian3%5%
Born abroad11%15%
Jobs in manufacturing11%11%
Jobs in farming or mining1%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.