Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Connecticut House

Connecticut House District 88

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

99% chance of a Democratic win · Josh Elliott (D), Hudson Molinari (R)

Connecticut House District 88: ForecastConnecticut House 103: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+15Connecticut House 114: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+13Connecticut House 85: chance of a Democratic win 96%; 2024 president D+8Connecticut House 87: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+8Connecticut House 89: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+10Connecticut House 91: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+54Connecticut House District 88: Forecast9185871031148988
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 88 is safe Democratic. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 4 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+27 to D+73, middle D+50
CandidatesJosh Elliott (D), Hudson Molinari (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberJosh Elliott

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+32
Governor 2022D+36
Legislature 2024uncontested (D)
President 2024D+42
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtConnecticut
Median household income$108,694$93,760
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)53%42%
Median age3641
White (not Hispanic)69%63%
Black14%10%
Hispanic7%18%
Asian6%5%
Born abroad13%15%
Jobs in manufacturing8%11%
Jobs in farming or mining0%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.