Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Connecticut House

Connecticut House District 61

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

4% chance of a Democratic win · James Mol (D), Tami Zawistowski (R)

Connecticut House District 61: ForecastConnecticut House 15: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+68Connecticut House 16: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+30Connecticut House 58: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+7Connecticut House 60: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+29Connecticut House 62: chance of a Democratic win 28%; 2024 president D+1Massachusetts House 2nd Hampden: chance of a Democratic win 96%; 2024 president D+9Massachusetts House 3rd Hampden: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+13Connecticut House District 61: Forecast58156016MA 2nd Hampden62MA 3rd Hampden61
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 61 is safe Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win4%
Likely margin (80% range)R+27 to R+4, middle R+15
CandidatesJames Mol (D), Tami Zawistowski (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberTami Zawistowski

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+21
Governor 2022R+2
Legislature 2024R+19
President 2024D+1
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtConnecticut
Median household income$115,044$93,760
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)39%42%
Median age4341
White (not Hispanic)80%63%
Black6%10%
Hispanic7%18%
Asian3%5%
Born abroad6%15%
Jobs in manufacturing13%11%
Jobs in farming or mining2%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.