Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Connecticut House

Connecticut House District 123

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

35% chance of a Democratic win · Bill Mecca (D), David J Rutigliano (R)

Connecticut House District 123: ForecastConnecticut House 112: chance of a Democratic win 13%; 2024 president R+2Connecticut House 122: chance of a Democratic win 12%; 2024 president R+3Connecticut House 134: chance of a Democratic win 94%; 2024 president D+17Connecticut House District 123: Forecast134122112123
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 123 is competitive. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win35%
Likely margin (80% range)R+14 to D+8, middle R+3
CandidatesBill Mecca (D), David J Rutigliano (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+7
Governor 2022R+1
Legislature 2024R+10
President 2024D+4
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtConnecticut
Median household income$171,916$93,760
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)59%42%
Median age4241
White (not Hispanic)78%63%
Black2%10%
Hispanic6%18%
Asian10%5%
Born abroad16%15%
Jobs in manufacturing12%11%
Jobs in farming or mining0%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.