Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Connecticut House

Connecticut House District 101

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Democrat is running · John-Michael Parker (D)

Connecticut House District 101: Decided: only a Democrat is runningConnecticut House 100: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+26Connecticut House 35: chance of a Democratic win 53%; 2024 president D+7Connecticut House 36: chance of a Democratic win 95%; 2024 president D+16Connecticut House 86: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+13Connecticut House 90: chance of a Democratic win 23%; 2024 president R+2Connecticut House 98: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+30Connecticut House District 101: Decided: only a Democrat is running1009098863536101
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 101 is safe Democratic. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans, 1 is competitive.

StatusDecided: only a Democrat is running
CandidatesJohn-Michael Parker (D)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberJohn-Michael Parker

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+11
Governor 2022D+9
Legislature 2024D+16
President 2024D+19
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtConnecticut
Median household income$155,430$93,760
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)66%42%
Median age5041
White (not Hispanic)88%63%
Black1%10%
Hispanic3%18%
Asian4%5%
Born abroad8%15%
Jobs in manufacturing12%11%
Jobs in farming or mining0%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.