Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Alabama House

Alabama House District 102

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Republican is running · Shane Stringer (R)

Alabama House District 102: Decided: only a Republican is runningAlabama House 100: chance of a Democratic win <1%Alabama House 101: chance of a Democratic win 4%Alabama House 64: chance of a Democratic win <1%Alabama House 65: chance of a Democratic win <1%Alabama House 96: chance of a Democratic win 7%Alabama House 97: chance of a Democratic win >99%Alabama House 98: chance of a Democratic win >99%Alabama House 99: chance of a Democratic win 96%Mississippi lower 105: no election in 2026Mississippi lower 109: no election in 2026Alabama House District 102: Decided: only a Republican is running99979864MS 109MS 10565102
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 102 is safe Republican. Of its 10 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 5 favour Republicans, 2 have no 2026 forecast. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusDecided: only a Republican is running
CandidatesShane Stringer (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberShane Stringer

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (R)
Governor 2022R+69
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtAlabama
Median household income$60,605$62,027
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)14%28%
Median age3839
White (not Hispanic)77%64%
Black15%26%
Hispanic2%5%
Asian1%1%
Born abroad1%4%
Jobs in manufacturing16%14%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.