OH-5 · House
election-day forecast · ground-up model · as of 2026-10-02
The district, in brief
Ohio's 5th encompasses the lower portion of Northwestern Ohio and the middle shore of Lake Erie, taking in Findlay, Lorain, Oberlin and Bowling Green. The facts on file mark the district as redrawn for 2026, on a map first used this cycle; the text does not describe how the lines changed and gives no presidential result for the district.
The incumbent is Republican Bob Latta, re-elected with 67.50% of the vote in 2024 and unopposed in his primary. The Democratic nominee is Brian Shaver, president of Fostoria City Council, who won a four-way primary with 28.7% over Martin Heberling III (25.8%), Daniel Burket (24.4%) and Scott Tabor (21.1%). Libertarian Michael J. Veloff was nominated as a write-in with 25 votes and is on the general-election ballot; an independent, Dalton Franklin, filed paperwork but is not in the results table. As of May 8, 2026 Latta had raised $1,242,571 with $903,094 on hand; Shaver reported $0 raised and $0 on hand.
Every rater listed calls the seat R: Decision Desk HQ (July 14, 2026), the Cook Political Report (November 2, 2025), Inside Elections (October 31, 2025) and Sabato's Crystal Ball (April 10, 2025). The text records no district polls.
A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.
The facts, each beside its sentence
The incumbent is Republican Bob Latta, who was re-elected with 67.50% of the vote in 2024.
The incumbent is Republican Bob Latta
Brian Shaver, president of Fostoria City Council
Bob Latta, incumbent U.S. representative
Brian Shaver, president of Fostoria City Council
Bob Latta, incumbent U.S. representative
who was re-elected with 67.50% of the vote in 2024
The 5th district encompasses the lower portion of Northwestern Ohio and the middle shore of Lake Erie, taking in Findlay, Lorain, Oberlin, and Bowling Green.
candidate: Brian Shaver votes: 11,914 percentage: 28.7
Decision Desk HQ R July 14, 2026 The Cook Political Report R November 2, 2025
Bob Latta (R) $1,242,571 $936,272 $903,094
candidate: Michael J. Veloff (write-in) votes: 25 percentage: 100.0
===Independents=== ====Filed paperwork==== *Dalton Franklin
Not in the source: The text gives no presidential results for the district on any lines.; The text does not say how the 2026 map changed the district, only that the facts mark it as redrawn.; No district polls are in the text, and the model's basis records no district polls.; No general-election ratings finer than 'R' are given; no endorsements are listed.
Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as 568e9f52653f; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.
Who holds the seat now
Robert E. Latta (Republican), in this chamber since 2007, 10 terms. Committees: House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.
How it has voted for president
| Two-party margin | 2016 | 2020 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| President | R+19.6 | R+20.7 | R+23.1 |
A shift of 3.6 points toward the Republicans from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.
Who are the voters?
| Group (adults 25+) | Share of adults | Turnout 2020 / midterm | Share of a midterm electorate | Est. Democratic share, 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White, no degree | 65% | 64% / 43% | 61% | 19% |
| White, degree | 22% | 87% / 67% | 31% | 70% |
| Black | 4% | 63% / 31% | 3% | 94% |
| Hispanic | 6% | 46% / 23% | 3% | 66% |
| Asian | 1% | 41% / 28% | 1% | 70% |
| Other / multiracial | 2% | 68% / 46% | 2% | 66% |
Of about 533,167 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 39.3% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 39.7% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 0.8 points toward Democrats. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.
Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.
The money
| Candidate | Raised | Cash on hand | PAC share | Self-funded | Outside $ for | Outside $ against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latta, Robert Edward (REP) incumbent | $1,461,648 | $1,019,993 | 55% | 0% | $0 | $0 |
| Shaver, Brian Alan Mr. (DEM) challenger | $11,664 | $8,742 | 0% | 47% | $0 | $0 |
| Heberling, Martin Mathias Mr. Iii (DEM) challenger · not on our roster | $10,900 | $130 | 0% | 98% | $0 | $0 |
| Burket, Daniel (DEM) challenger · not on our roster | $7,551 | $0 | 0% | 17% | $0 | $0 |
| Mundy, Keith Francis (DEM) challenger · not on our roster | $4,091 | $-1,605 | 82% | 12% | $0 | $0 |
FEC bulk candidate summaries through June 30, 2026; no independent expenditures reported for or against any candidate, which usually means nobody outside the district thinks it is in play.
The district in numbers
| Measure | District | Nation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bachelor's degree or higher, 25+ | 24.5% | 34.9% | -10.4 pts |
| White, non-Hispanic | 82.9% | 58.2% | +24.7 pts |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 4.3% | 12.0% | -7.6 pts |
| Hispanic or Latino | 7.8% | 19.0% | -11.2 pts |
| Asian, non-Hispanic | 1.1% | 5.8% | -4.6 pts |
| Foreign-born | 2.5% | 13.9% | -11.4 pts |
| Median age | 40.9 | 39.2 | 1.7 |
| Median household income | $71,647 | $84,362 | $-12,715 |
| Median home value | $183,640 | $379,737 | $-196,097 |
| Owner-occupied homes | 71.7% | 65.1% | +6.6 pts |
| Unemployment, July 2026 (BLS county data) | 3.4% | 4.4% | -1.0 pts |
| Change in unemployment, past 12 months | -1.5 pts | — | — |
| Change since the last election (24 months) | -1.5 pts | — | — |
| Unemployment (ACS) | 4.3% | 5.2% | -0.9 pts |
| Federal government workers | 1.9% | 2.6% | -0.8 pts |
| Work from home | 7.5% | 13.5% | -6.0 pts |
| Households on SNAP | 11.1% | 11.8% | -0.7 pts |
| Households with Social Security income | 34.4% | 31.2% | +3.1 pts |
| Households with public assistance income | 2.6% | 2.7% | -0.0 pts |
| Moved in from another state, past year | 1.2% | 2.3% | -1.1 pts |
| Gini index | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
| Per-capita personal income (BEA), 2024 | $58,968 | $73,248 | $-14,280 |
| Per-capita income growth since 2019, nominal, 2024 | 30.2% | 32.0% | -1.7 pts |
| Government and other transfers, share of income, 2024 | 23.4% | 19.6% | +3.8 pts |
| Social Security, share of income, 2022 | 7.9% | 5.8% | +2.0 pts |
| Medicare, share of income, 2022 | 6.1% | 4.5% | +1.7 pts |
| Medicaid, share of income, 2022 | 4.2% | 4.0% | +0.2 pts |
| SNAP, share of income, 2022 | 0.6% | 0.6% | -0.0 pts |
| Earned Income Tax Credit, share of income, 2022 | 0.4% | 0.4% | +0.0 pts |
| Veterans' benefits, share of income, 2022 | 0.7% | 0.9% | -0.2 pts |
| Federal civilian jobs, share of all jobs, 2022 | 0.5% | 1.3% | -0.7 pts |
| Military jobs, share of all jobs, 2022 | 0.4% | 0.9% | -0.5 pts |
ACS 5-year 2023, assembled from census tracts by the 2020 population of their blocks inside the current lines, because the Bureau has not tabulated these lines; medians are population-weighted means of tract medians. Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.
Who is favoured, and by how much?
The 90% interval runs from -31.9 to -1.7 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.
What is this built on?
A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.
Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.
Why does the model say this?
Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: 2024 presidential lean (R+21.6): 8.7 pts toward the Republican; 2024 House lean: 4.1 pts toward the Republican; experience gap (-3 levels, D minus R): 1.5 pts toward the Republican; PAC money balance: 0.9 pts toward the Republican; asian share (1.2%): 0.7 pts toward the Republican.
How sure is it, and of what?
Total sd 9.21 points, made of the seat's own volatility 92%, correlated polling error 8%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.
Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.
How was this number made?
Run 00a09d4b-7980-4ec5-ada0-077968a87242, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).