CO-3 · House

The district, in brief

Colorado's 3rd district encompasses the Colorado Western Slope, including the cities of Montrose, Pueblo, and Grand Junction. The lines are not redrawn for 2026; the facts record the map as first used in 2022. The text gives no presidential results, but the facts carry a 2024 presidential baseline on the current lines.

The incumbent is Republican Jeff Hurd, elected with 50.8% of the vote in 2024. Donald Trump rescinded his endorsement of Hurd in February 2026, calling him a "RINO", backed Hope Scheppelman, then re-endorsed Hurd the following month after Scheppelman agreed to withdraw. Hurd won the Republican primary with 66.4% over Ron Hanks, a former state representative, at 33.6%. The Democratic nominee is Dwayne Romero, a real estate company CEO and U.S. Army officer, who won his primary with 54.8% over Alex Kelloff, a ski company founder, at 45.2%. Adam Frisch, the nominee in 2022 and 2024, declined to run and endorsed Romero. As of June 10, 2026 Hurd had raised $3,552,599 with $1,760,849 on hand; Romero $716,276 with $84,208 on hand.

Every rater listed calls the seat R: Decision Desk HQ (July 14, 2026), the Cook Political Report (August 13, 2026), Inside Elections (March 12, 2026), Sabato's Crystal Ball (April 10, 2025) and The Economist (May 6, 2026). One general-election poll is recorded: Keating Research, a Democratic firm polling for Romero's campaign (July 21–23, 2026, 500 likely voters), had Hurd 46%, Romero 45%, undecided 9%. Earlier polls by Ragnar Research Partners (R) and Expedition Strategies (D) tested Hurd against Kelloff, not Romero.

A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.

The facts, each beside its sentence

Not in the source: No presidential results in the text; the facts carry a 2024 presidential baseline on the current lines but the text does not state it.; The model's basis says no district polls, but the text records one general-election poll (Keating Research, July 21–23, 2026) and two Hurd-vs-Kelloff polls; none is in the project's poll corpus.; The general-election fundraising table is dated June 10, 2026, not June 30.; Endorsement sections are empty apart from the Trump episode and Frisch's endorsement of Romero described in prose.; No general-election ratings finer than 'R' are given (no Lean/Likely/Safe).

Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as 8bb7a50842a1; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.

Who holds the seat now

Jeff Hurd (Republican), in this chamber since 2025, 1 term. Committees: House Committee on Natural Resources; House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.

How it has voted for president

A shift of 5.4 points toward the Democrats from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.

Who are the voters?

Of about 507,528 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 45.8% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 47.1% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 2.7 points toward Democrats. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.

Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.

The money

FEC bulk candidate summaries through June 30, 2026; $122,248 of independent expenditures for or against these candidates this cycle (FEC Schedule E, types 24E and 24A), which is the parties' and outside groups' own revealed view of whether this seat is in play.

The district in numbers

ACS 5-year 2023, the Census Bureau's own tabulation of this district (118th Congress lines). Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.

Who is favoured, and by how much?

The 90% interval runs from -21.5 to +6.3 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.

What is this built on?

A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.

Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.

Why does the model say this?

Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: experience gap (-4 levels, D minus R): 1.6 pts toward the Republican; PAC money balance: 1.2 pts toward the Republican; asian share (0.8%): 0.9 pts toward the Republican; snap share (13.3%): 0.6 pts toward the Republican; religion: muslim (0.0%): 0.5 pts toward the Democrat.

How sure is it, and of what?

Total sd 8.46 points, made of the seat's own volatility 90%, correlated polling error 10%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.

Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.

How was this number made?

Run 6f211e6f-2bdc-4dda-8f72-81fc628dab0b, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).