FL-22 · House
election-day forecast · ground-up model · as of 2026-10-02
The district, in brief
Florida's 22nd is on a map first used in 2026; the text does not describe the new lines. The seat's incumbent, Democrat Lois Frankel, re-elected with 55.0% in 2024, withdrew to run in the 23rd district, so the seat is open.
The Democratic nominee is Pia Dandiya, manager of the Apple Strategic Innovations Group, who previously ran in the 21st district and won the primary with 68.6% over attorney Kaysia Earley (31.4%). The Republican nominee is Casey Askar, a businessman and 2020 candidate for the 19th district, who took 30.9% in a seven-way primary ahead of Michael Carbonara (18.9%), Belinda Keiser (18.3%) and David Burck (15.7%). Deborah Adeimy and Dan Franzese, the district's Republican candidates in 2022 and 2024, withdrew to run in the 23rd and 25th districts. As of July 29, 2026 Dandiya had raised $2,284,052 with $1,296,684 on hand; Askar had raised $2,567,760, of which $2,500,000 was self funded, with $1,048,396 on hand.
Decision Desk HQ (August 30, 2026), Inside Elections (August 20, 2026) and Sabato's Crystal Ball (August 26, 2026) list the seat as Flip; the Cook Political Report (September 25, 2026) and The Economist (August 30, 2026) call it Tossup. Two general-election polls, both from Democratic firms, are recorded: Tulchin Research (August 24–31, 2026) had Dandiya 46%, Askar 44%; Tavern Research (August 10–12, 2026, 551 LV) had them tied at 50%.
A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.
The facts, each beside its sentence
The incumbent is Democrat Lois Frankel, who was re-elected with 55.0% of the vote in 2024.
Lois Frankel, incumbent U.S. representative (running in the 23rd district)
Pia Dandiya, manager of the Apple Strategic Innovations Group (previously ran in the 21st district)
Casey Askar, businessman and candidate for the 19th district in 2020
Pia Dandiya, manager of the Apple Strategic Innovations Group (previously ran in the 21st district)
Casey Askar, businessman and candidate for the 19th district in 2020
who was re-elected with 55.0% of the vote in 2024
candidate: Casey Askar votes: 14,774 percentage: 30.9
Decision Desk HQ Flip August 30, 2026 The Cook Political Report Tossup September 25, 2026
Pia Dandiya (D) $2,284,052 $987,368 $1,296,684
Tavern Research (D) August 10–12, 2026 551 (LV)
GQR (D) June 18–25, 2026 400 (LV)
Michael Carbonara (R) $6,332,573$3,772,598 was self funded
Dan Franzese, businessman and nominee for this district in 2022 and 2024 (running in the 25th district)
Jared Moskowitz, incumbent U.S. representative from the 23rd district (running in the 25th district)
Lev Parnas (I) $30,167 $28,839 $1,328
Not in the source: The text does not describe the redrawn district's geography or give any presidential result on the new lines.; No rating finer than 'Flip' or 'Tossup' is given, and the text does not say which party each rater expects to flip the seat.; The two general-election polls are on Wikipedia but not in this project's poll corpus; the model's basis records no district polls.; The text names no endorsements for either nominee (the endorsement sections are empty).; Lev Parnas appears only in a fundraising table; the text does not say whether he is on the general-election ballot.
Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as 27e2e54e6981; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.
Who holds the seat now
Lois Frankel (Democrat), in this chamber since 2013, 7 terms. Committees: House Committee on Appropriations.
From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.
How it has voted for president
| Two-party margin | 2016 | 2020 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| President | D+13.6 | D+9.8 | R+3.0 |
A shift of 16.7 points toward the Republicans from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.
Who are the voters?
| Group (adults 25+) | Share of adults | Turnout 2020 / midterm | Share of a midterm electorate | Est. Democratic share, 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White, no degree | 28% | 58% / 44% | 28% | 22% |
| White, degree | 22% | 79% / 68% | 35% | 58% |
| Black | 12% | 52% / 37% | 10% | 93% |
| Hispanic | 31% | 40% / 29% | 21% | 55% |
| Asian | 4% | 44% / 30% | 3% | 74% |
| Other / multiracial | 3% | 56% / 43% | 3% | 68% |
Of about 533,367 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 51.5% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 51.5% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 0.1 points toward Republicans. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.
Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.
The money
| Candidate | Raised | Cash on hand | PAC share | Self-funded | Outside $ for | Outside $ against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbonara, Michael (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $4,763,903 | $36,589 | 0% | 89% | $92,044 | $81,500 |
| Keiser, Belinda (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $3,797,856 | $701,594 | 0% | 93% | $0 | $286,952 |
| Askar, Casey (REP) challenger | $2,578,519 | $1,058,655 | 0% | 97% | $0 | $704,803 |
| Wertheim, Herbert Dr. Od (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $2,500,000 | $0 | 0% | 100% | $0 | $0 |
| Dandiya, Pia (DEM) challenger | $2,284,052 | $1,296,684 | 3% | 11% | $0 | $0 |
| Franzese, Daniel John (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $1,488,421 | $471,644 | 0% | 86% | $0 | $0 |
| Medvedeva, Anna (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $278,318 | $0 | 2% | 90% | $0 | $0 |
| Burck, David (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $255,073 | $67,108 | 0% | 0% | $206,549 | $0 |
| Hasdorff, Terri (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $46,150 | $27,867 | 0% | 33% | $0 | $0 |
| Parnas, Lev (IND) challenger · not on our roster | $30,167 | $1,328 | 0% | 0% | $0 | $0 |
| Earley, Kaysia (DEM) challenger · not on our roster | $25,904 | $4,265 | 2% | 43% | $0 | $0 |
| Thompson, Michael (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $23,613 | $2,967 | 0% | 0% | $0 | $0 |
| Baxter, Sara (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $14,150 | $0 | 0% | 75% | $0 | $0 |
| Anderson, Jillian (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $472 | $0 | 0% | 100% | $0 | $0 |
| Srado, Antonio (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $328 | $0 | 0% | 0% | $0 | $0 |
FEC bulk candidate summaries through July 29, 2026; $1,371,848 of independent expenditures for or against these candidates this cycle (FEC Schedule E, types 24E and 24A), which is the parties' and outside groups' own revealed view of whether this seat is in play.
The district in numbers
| Measure | District | Nation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bachelor's degree or higher, 25+ | 40.5% | 34.9% | +5.6 pts |
| White, non-Hispanic | 44.9% | 58.2% | -13.4 pts |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 13.3% | 12.0% | +1.4 pts |
| Hispanic or Latino | 33.1% | 19.0% | +14.1 pts |
| Asian, non-Hispanic | 4.0% | 5.8% | -1.8 pts |
| Foreign-born | 29.6% | 13.9% | +15.7 pts |
| Median age | 42.3 | 39.2 | 3.1 |
| Median household income | $106,276 | $84,362 | $+21,914 |
| Median home value | $477,289 | $379,737 | $+97,552 |
| Owner-occupied homes | 73.7% | 65.1% | +8.6 pts |
| Unemployment, July 2026 (BLS county data) | 4.8% | 4.4% | +0.4 pts |
| Change in unemployment, past 12 months | +0.7 pts | — | — |
| Change since the last election (24 months) | +1.0 pts | — | — |
| Unemployment (ACS) | 4.7% | 5.2% | -0.5 pts |
| Federal government workers | 1.5% | 2.6% | -1.1 pts |
| Work from home | 15.3% | 13.5% | +1.9 pts |
| Households on SNAP | 8.2% | 11.8% | -3.6 pts |
| Households with Social Security income | 32.2% | 31.2% | +1.0 pts |
| Households with public assistance income | 1.7% | 2.7% | -1.0 pts |
| Moved in from another state, past year | 2.6% | 2.3% | +0.3 pts |
| Gini index | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
| Per-capita personal income (BEA), 2024 | $104,562 | $73,248 | $+31,314 |
| Per-capita income growth since 2019, nominal, 2024 | 42.0% | 32.0% | +10.1 pts |
| Government and other transfers, share of income, 2024 | 12.9% | 19.6% | -6.6 pts |
| Social Security, share of income, 2022 | 4.5% | 5.8% | -1.3 pts |
| Medicare, share of income, 2022 | 3.8% | 4.5% | -0.7 pts |
| Medicaid, share of income, 2022 | 1.4% | 4.0% | -2.6 pts |
| SNAP, share of income, 2022 | 0.3% | 0.6% | -0.4 pts |
| Earned Income Tax Credit, share of income, 2022 | 0.3% | 0.4% | -0.1 pts |
| Veterans' benefits, share of income, 2022 | 0.4% | 0.9% | -0.5 pts |
| Federal civilian jobs, share of all jobs, 2022 | 0.5% | 1.3% | -0.8 pts |
| Military jobs, share of all jobs, 2022 | 0.3% | 0.9% | -0.7 pts |
ACS 5-year 2023, assembled from census tracts by the 2020 population of their blocks inside the current lines, because the Bureau has not tabulated these lines; medians are population-weighted means of tract medians. Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.
Who is favoured, and by how much?
The 90% interval runs from -6.0 to +24.0 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.
What is this built on?
A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.
Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.
Why does the model say this?
Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: PAC money balance: 8.3 pts toward the Democrat; 2024 presidential lean (R+1.5): 1.4 pts toward the Democrat; outside money balance: 1.1 pts toward the Democrat; total outside/party money: 0.6 pts toward the Democrat; snap share (8.3%): 0.5 pts toward the Democrat.
How sure is it, and of what?
Total sd 9.13 points, made of the seat's own volatility 91%, correlated polling error 9%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.
Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.
How was this number made?
Run 6f211e6f-2bdc-4dda-8f72-81fc628dab0b, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).