FutureBallotU.S. election forecasts, with every number traced to its source

VA-11 · House

election-day forecast · ground-up model · as of 2026-10-02

Safe D
100%
James Walkinshaw
Democrat
0%
Arthur Purves
Republican
Expected margin and its 90% range
R+40R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20D+40D+42.0
What moves this district (points of margin; blue toward the Democrat, red toward the Republican)
2024 presidential lean+29.7
experience gap+11.9
2024 House lean+10.7
PAC money balance+8.1
2022 House lean+1.9

The district, in brief

Virginia's 11th covers suburban Northern Virginia, including the city of Fairfax and portions of Fairfax County, on the map first used in 2022. The text gives no presidential result for the district; the facts give a 2024 presidential baseline on these lines of 35.3 for the Democrat.

The incumbent is Democrat James Walkinshaw, elected with 75.1% in a special election to finish the term of Gerry Connolly, who had announced in April that he would not run again, citing health, and died in office on May 21, 2025. Two Democrats, Bree Fram and Amy Roma, withdrew from the primary; Roma had raised $1,285,227. The Republican nominee is Arthur Purves, president of the Fairfax County taxpayers alliance and a perennial candidate, after Gavin Solomon withdrew. Green Party activist Dianne Blais is also on the ballot. As of July 15, 2026 Walkinshaw had raised $2,758,961 with $979,176 on hand; Purves had raised $5,637 with $200 on hand.

Every rater listed calls the seat D: Decision Desk HQ (July 14, 2026), the Cook Political Report, Inside Elections and Sabato's Crystal Ball (all April 21, 2026). The text says Walkinshaw is not expected to face a serious challenge from Republicans or third parties. No district polls are recorded.

A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.

The facts, each beside its sentence

Incumbent
James Walkinshaw (D)The incumbent is Democrat James Walkinshaw, who was elected with 75.1% of the vote in a special election to finish the term of representative Gerry Connolly, who died in office on May 21, 2025.
Open seat
noThe incumbent is Democrat James Walkinshaw
Democratic nominee
James Walkinshaw*James Walkinshaw, incumbent U.S. representative
Republican nominee
Arthur Purves*Arthur Purves, president of the Fairfax County taxpayers alliance and perennial candidate
Democrat's background
Incumbent U.S. representative, elected in the 2025 special election after Gerry Connolly's deathwho was elected with 75.1% of the vote in a special election to finish the term of representative Gerry Connolly
Republican's background
President of the Fairfax County taxpayers alliance; perennial candidatepresident of the Fairfax County taxpayers alliance and perennial candidate
Last result
Walkinshaw elected with 75.1% in the 2025 special election; Connolly had announced in April he would not seek re-election, citing health, and died May 21, 2025Connolly had previously announced he would not run for re-election in April, citing health concerns.
Primaries
No primary results given; two Democrats withdrew (Bree Fram, a retired U.S. Space Force colonel, and lawyer Amy Roma) and one Republican (Gavin Solomon)*Bree Fram, retired U.S. Space Force colonel *Amy Roma, lawyer
Raters
Decision Desk HQ: D (July 14, 2026); Cook: D (April 21, 2026); Inside Elections: D (April 21, 2026); Sabato's Crystal Ball: D (April 21, 2026)Decision Desk HQ D July 14, 2026 The Cook Political Report D April 21, 2026 Inside Elections D April 21, 2026 Sabato's Crystal Ball D April 21, 2026
Money
As of July 15, 2026: Walkinshaw raised $2,758,961, spent $1,779,785, $979,176 on hand; Purves raised $5,637, spent $5,437, $200 on hand| James Walkinshaw (D) $2,758,961 $1,779,785 $979,176 | Arthur Purves (R) $5,637 $5,437 $200
Also
The text calls this a safe Democratic seat with no serious challenge expected from Republicans or third partiesCongressman Walkinshaw represents a safe Democratic seat and is not expected to face a serious challenge from Republicans or third parties.
A Green Party nominee, activist Dianne Blais, is on the ballot===Green Party=== ====Nominee==== *Dianne Blais, activist
Withdrawn Democrat Amy Roma had raised and spent $1,285,227 before leaving the race|Amy Roma (D) $1,285,227 $1,285,227 $0

Not in the source: The text gives no presidential result for the district.; The facts' results list ends with Gerry Connolly's 2024 win and does not include the 2025 special election.; No primary results are given for either party.; Purves' figures are dated June 30, 2026 in the Republican primary table and July 15, 2026 in the general-election table.; No polls are on the page and the model's basis says no district polls.

Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as c1a7fb5c3c14; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.

Who holds the seat now

James R. Walkinshaw (Democrat), in this chamber since 2025, 1 term. Committees: House Committee on Homeland Security; House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.

How it has voted for president

Two-party margin201620202024
PresidentD+38.3D+42.6D+35.9

A shift of 2.4 points toward the Republicans from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.

Who are the voters?

Group (adults 25+)Share of adultsTurnout 2020 / midtermShare of a midterm electorateEst. Democratic share, 2020
White, no degree13%65% / 46%13%26%
White, degree40%89% / 71%58%74%
Black8%58% / 41%7%91%
Hispanic12%32% / 21%5%79%
Asian24%49% / 28%14%85%
Other / multiracial3%66% / 49%3%69%

Of about 532,615 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 70.9% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 70.7% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 0.4 points toward Republicans. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.

Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.

The money

CandidateRaisedCash on handPAC shareSelf-fundedOutside $ forOutside $ against
Walkinshaw, James (DEM)
incumbent
$2,758,961$979,17633%0%$2,731,227$2,790
Roma, Amy (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$1,285,227$00%59%$43,761$0
Connolly, Gerald Edward (DEM)
incumbent · not on our roster
$718,796$023%0%$0$0
Pekarsky, Stella (DEM)
challenger · not on our roster
$398,266$3415%63%$161,495$26,312
Fram, Bree (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$289,058$1,3790%0%$0$0
Whitson, Stewart (REP)
open seat · not on our roster
$268,077$03%2%$4,090$0
Headrick, Nathan (REP)
challenger · not on our roster
$252,395$00%99%$0$0
Martinez Nucete, Leo (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$220,250$02%17%$0$0
Shin, Irene (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$145,935$013%0%$201,508$0
Lee, Daniel (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$137,141$00%43%$0$0
Papanu, Amy (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$96,535$00%83%$0$0
Punnoose, Priya Dr. (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$62,295$010%32%$0$0
Rand, Lucas (REP)
open seat · not on our roster
$50,230$00%37%$0$0
Bennett, Candice (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$37,520$1,5660%23%$0$0
Lipsman, Karina (REP)
open seat · not on our roster
$22,189$00%0%$0$0
Purves, Arthur Grahame Mr. (REP)
open seat
$10,780$2000%37%$0$0
Aisen, Joshua (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$6,495$00%0%$0$0
Van Meter, Michael Lewis (REP)
challenger · not on our roster
$4,579$00%0%$0$0

FEC bulk candidate summaries through August 27, 2026; $3,171,183 of independent expenditures for or against these candidates this cycle (FEC Schedule E, types 24E and 24A), which is the parties' and outside groups' own revealed view of whether this seat is in play.

The district in numbers

MeasureDistrictNationDifference
Bachelor's degree or higher, 25+67.6%34.9%+32.6 pts
White, non-Hispanic49.0%58.2%-9.2 pts
Black, non-Hispanic8.5%12.0%-3.5 pts
Hispanic or Latino14.6%19.0%-4.4 pts
Asian, non-Hispanic22.2%5.8%+16.5 pts
Foreign-born30.4%13.9%+16.6 pts
Median age38.839.2-0.4
Median household income$158,319$84,362$+73,957
Median home value$698,300$379,737$+318,563
Owner-occupied homes69.9%65.1%+4.8 pts
Unemployment, July 2026 (BLS county data)3.4%4.4%-1.0 pts
Change in unemployment, past 12 months+0.2 pts——
Change since the last election (24 months)+0.6 pts——
Unemployment (ACS)3.9%5.2%-1.3 pts
Federal government workers12.9%2.6%+10.3 pts
Work from home26.7%13.5%+13.2 pts
Households on SNAP3.0%11.8%-8.8 pts
Households with Social Security income22.2%31.2%-9.0 pts
Households with public assistance income1.6%2.7%-1.1 pts
Moved in from another state, past year3.2%2.3%+0.9 pts
Gini index0.400.44-0.04
Per-capita personal income (BEA), 2024$114,330$73,248$+41,082
Per-capita income growth since 2019, nominal, 202433.7%32.0%+1.7 pts
Government and other transfers, share of income, 20248.2%19.6%-11.4 pts
Social Security, share of income, 20222.7%5.8%-3.1 pts
Medicare, share of income, 20221.6%4.5%-2.8 pts
Medicaid, share of income, 20221.1%4.0%-2.8 pts
SNAP, share of income, 20220.1%0.6%-0.5 pts
Earned Income Tax Credit, share of income, 20220.1%0.4%-0.2 pts
Veterans' benefits, share of income, 20220.5%0.9%-0.3 pts
Federal civilian jobs, share of all jobs, 20224.9%1.3%+3.6 pts
Military jobs, share of all jobs, 20221.0%0.9%+0.1 pts

ACS 5-year 2023, the Census Bureau's own tabulation of this district (118th Congress lines). Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.

Who is favoured, and by how much?

>99%
James Walkinshaw
run 6f211e6f · house_district_prior/0.2.0 · as of 2026-10-02
+42.0
expected margin, D-R
run 6f211e6f · house_district_prior/0.2.0 · as of 2026-10-02

The 90% interval runs from +28.1 to +55.7 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.

What is this built on?

A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.

Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.

Why does the model say this?

Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: 2024 presidential lean (D+36.8): 29.7 pts toward the Democrat; experience gap (+4 levels, D minus R): 11.9 pts toward the Democrat; 2024 House lean (D+36.7): 10.7 pts toward the Democrat; PAC money balance: 8.1 pts toward the Democrat; 2022 House lean (D+36.2): 1.9 pts toward the Democrat.

How sure is it, and of what?

Total sd 8.43 points, made of the seat's own volatility 90%, correlated polling error 10%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.

Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.

How was this number made?

Run 6f211e6f-2bdc-4dda-8f72-81fc628dab0b, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).