State legislatures › New Hampshire House
New Hampshire House District Hillsborough 2
2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC
31% chance of a Democratic win · Matthew Castanien (R), Todd C. Fahey (D), John K. Fitzgerald (D), Phil Greazzo (R), Jeffrey L. Kerr (D), Peter Kujawski (R), Brian Labrie (R), Pat MacMonagle (R), Kristin Noble (R), Ryan Nugent (D), Sheila Quick (D), Catherine A. Rombeau (D), John Schneller (R), Geoffrey Wellington (D)
District Hillsborough 2 leans Republican. Of its 11 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 4 favour Republicans, 2 are competitive.
| Status | Elects 7: expected Democratic seats 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Chance of a Democratic win | 31% |
| Likely margin (80% range) | R+16 to D+7, middle R+4 |
| Candidates | Matthew Castanien (R), Todd C. Fahey (D), John K. Fitzgerald (D), Phil Greazzo (R), Jeffrey L. Kerr (D), Peter Kujawski (R), Brian Labrie (R), Pat MacMonagle (R), Kristin Noble (R), Ryan Nugent (D), Sheila Quick (D), Catherine A. Rombeau (D), John Schneller (R), Geoffrey Wellington (D) |
| Candidate list from | civic guide |
How it has voted
On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.
Who lives here
Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.
| This district | New Hampshire | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Median household income | $160,253 | $95,628 | |
| Bachelor's degree or more (25+) | 61% | 40% | |
| Median age | 44 | 43 | |
| White (not Hispanic) | 83% | 88% | |
| Black | 1% | 1% | |
| Hispanic | 4% | 5% | |
| Asian | 8% | 3% | |
| Born abroad | 11% | 6% | |
| Jobs in manufacturing | 11% | 13% | |
| Jobs in farming or mining | 0% | 1% |
Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.