Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Iowa Senate

Iowa Senate District 25

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

96% chance of a Democratic win · Paul Wacker (R), Herman C Quirmbach (D)

Iowa Senate District 25: ForecastIowa Senate 24: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+17Iowa Senate 26: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president D+1Iowa Senate District 25: Forecast262425
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 25 is safe Democratic. Of its 2 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win96%
Likely margin (80% range)D+13 to D+59, middle D+36
CandidatesPaul Wacker (R), Herman C Quirmbach (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberHerman Quirmbach

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022no two-party contest; won by Herman C Quirmbach (Democrat)
Governor 2022D+10
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtIowa
Median household income$60,385$73,147
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)63%31%
Median age2339
White (not Hispanic)77%83%
Black3%4%
Hispanic5%7%
Asian10%2%
Born abroad11%6%
Jobs in manufacturing8%15%
Jobs in farming or mining2%4%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.