FutureBallotU.S. election forecasts, with every number traced to its source

Michigan · Senate

election 2026-11-03 · forecast as of 2026-10-01 · margins and probabilities are for Abdul El-Sayed

Toss-up
54%
Abdul El-Sayed
Democrat
46%
Mike Rogers
Republican
Expected margin and its 90% range
R+40R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20D+40D+0.5

Who is running?

Abdul El-Sayed (Democratic), Mike Rogers (Republican), Douglas P. Marsh (Green), Lydia Christensen (Libertarian), Tim Long (Constitution), Walter P. Kristy (no party recorded). The margin below is Abdul El-Sayed minus the other candidate in the main contest; the rest are on the ballot and not in it.

The race, in brief

Michigan elects a U.S. senator on November 3, 2026, for the seat Democrat Gary Peters is leaving after two terms; he won with 54.6% in 2014 and 49.9% in 2020. The state backed Biden by 2.8% in 2020 and Trump by 1.4% in 2024. The text notes that Republicans have not won a Senate race in Michigan since 1994 and that this is the only open Democratic-held seat in a state Trump won in 2024. The state profile gives a median age of 40.1 and a college share of 0.3.

The Democratic nominee is Abdul El-Sayed, former Wayne County health director, who won the August 4 primary with 48.45% to Representative Haley Stevens's 47.55%, after Mallory McMorrow withdrew in July. The text says about $62 million was spent on Stevens's behalf, nearly $30 million of it by AIPAC. The Republican nominee is former congressman Mike Rogers, the 2024 nominee, endorsed by Donald Trump and unopposed after Bernadette Smith was disqualified. As of July 15, 2026 El-Sayed had raised $14,514,335 with $2,552,762 on hand, Rogers $10,898,177 with $4,473,237.

The raters split: CBS News, the Cook Political Report (September 23, 2026), Fox News, Inside Elections and RealClearPolitics list a Tossup; Decision Desk HQ, The Economist, FiftyPlusOne, Sabato's Crystal Ball (September 22, 2026), Silver Bulletin and Split Ticket list D. The text's polling average is El-Sayed 47.2%, Rogers 44.1%. Recent polls include Marist (September 24–27, 2026) at El-Sayed 51%, Rogers 44%; co/efficient (R) (September 21–23, 2026) tied at 45%; and NYT/Siena (September 15–22, 2026) at 49% to 44%.

A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.

The facts, each beside its sentence

Open seat
yesDemocratic incumbent Gary Peters is not seeking a third term.
Democratic nominee
Abdul El-SayedDemocratic former Wayne County health director Abdul El-Sayed and Republican former congressman Mike Rogers are the nominees for their respective parties.
Republican nominee
Mike RogersRogers, the Republican nominee in 2024, was the only candidate to qualify for his party's primary ballot.
Democrat's background
Former Wayne County health director (2023–2025); candidate for governor in 2018Abdul El-Sayed, former Wayne County health director (2023–2025) and candidate for governor in 2018
Republican's background
Former U.S. representative (2001–2015); Senate nominee in 2024Mike Rogers, former U.S. representative from 8 (2001–2015) and nominee for U.S. Senate in 2024
Presidential vote
Biden +2.8% in 2020; Trump +1.4% in 2024Most recently in the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, it backed Joe Biden by 2.8% and Donald Trump by 1.4%, respectively.
Last result
Peters won with 54.6% in 2014 and 49.9% in 2020Gary Peters was first elected with 54.6% of the vote in 2014 and re-elected with 49.9% in 2020.
Primaries
El-Sayed won the August 4 Democratic primary with 48.45% to Haley Stevens's 47.55% (McMorrow, withdrawn, 4.00%); Rogers unopposed after Bernadette Smith was disqualifiedAfter McMorrow withdrew in July, El-Sayed and Stevens remained in a tight race, which El-Sayed won on August 4 with 48.5% of the vote.
Raters
Tossup: CBS News, Cook, Fox News, Inside Elections, RealClearPolitics; D: Decision Desk HQ, The Economist, FiftyPlusOne, Sabato, Silver Bulletin, Split Ticket (all September 2026)The Cook Political Report Tossup September 23, 2026 Decision Desk HQ D September 25, 2026
Money
As of July 15, 2026: El-Sayed raised $14,514,335 with $2,552,762 on hand; Rogers raised $10,898,177 with $4,473,237 on hand|Abdul El-Sayed (D) $14,514,335 $11,961,573 $2,552,762 |Mike Rogers (R) $10,898,177 $6,680,643 $4,473,237
Also
Statewide polls: Marist (Sep 24–27, 2026, 1,235 RV) El-Sayed 51%, Rogers 44%; co/efficient (R) (Sep 21–23, 2026, 843 LV) 45%–45%; NYT/Siena (Sep 15–22, 2026, 605 LV) El-Sayed 49%, Rogers 44%; polling average El-Sayed +3.1%New York Times/Siena University September 15–22, 2026 605 (LV) ±4.9% |49% 44%
Outside spending of about $62 million for Stevens in the primary, nearly $30 million from AIPACAIPAC has spent nearly $30 million supporting Stevens, surpassing all of their prior investments made for a candidate in a particular race.
Rogers was absent from the September 15 debate; two further debates in October list both as invitedSeptember 15, 2026 Fox 2 Detroit Michigan Debate Commission Roop Raj YouTube P A
Republicans have not won a Michigan Senate race since 1994; the only open Democratic-held seat in a Trump 2024 stateThis is the only open Democratic-held Senate seat up for election in a state won by Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election.
Minor-party nominees: Lydia Christensen (L), Douglas P. Marsh (G), Tim Long (U.S. Taxpayers), Walter P. Kristy (Natural Law)Douglas P. Marsh, journalist and Green nominee for U.S. Senate in 2024

Not in the source: facts.forecast carries no basis field.; The Republican primary results table in the text is garbled; no vote total for Rogers is given.; The text gives no result for Rogers's 2024 Senate race.; No general-election finance report after July 15, 2026.; Endorsement sections are empty in the text.

Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as 436abd5f1c79; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.

Who holds the seat now

Gary C. Peters (Democrat), in this chamber since 2015, 2 terms, class 2 (term ends 2027). Committees: Senate Committee on Appropriations; Senate Committee on Armed Services; Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (Ranking Member).

Elissa Slotkin (Democrat), in this chamber since 2025, 1 term, class 1 (term ends 2031). Committees: Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; Senate Committee on Armed Services; Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs; Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.

The money

CandidateRaisedCash on handPAC shareSelf-fundedOutside $ forOutside $ against
El-Sayed, Abdul (DEM)
open seat
$14,514,336$2,552,7630%0%$2,771,560$20,590,767
Stevens, Haley (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$11,884,632$2,793,2946%0%$28,856,270$937,187
Mcmorrow, Mallory (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$11,386,720$1,867,6311%0%$20,353$0
Rogers, Michael J (REP)
open seat
$10,898,177$4,473,2377%0%$13,677,358$5,748,741
Peters, Gary (DEM)
incumbent · not on our roster
$248,405$6,546,3324%0%$100$7,351
Tate, Joseph Allen (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$243,636$03%0%$0$0
Scott, Genevieve (REP)
open seat · not on our roster
$83,079$2,5390%59%$0$0
Smith, Bernadette (REP)
open seat · not on our roster
$77,240$4,0670%0%$0$0
Howard, Rachel Elizabeth (DEM)
open seat · not on our roster
$10,937$4,7660%30%$0$0
Heurtebise, Frederick (REP)
open seat · not on our roster
$10,059$00%0%$0$0
Stephens, Thomas Wayne (NPA)
open seat · not on our roster
$1,000$7800%50%$0$0

FEC bulk candidate summaries through July 15, 2026; $72,609,687 of independent expenditures for or against these candidates this cycle (FEC Schedule E, types 24E and 24A), which is the parties' and outside groups' own revealed view of whether this seat is in play.

How it has voted for president

Two-party margin201620202024
PresidentR+0.2D+2.8R+1.4

A shift of 1.2 points toward the Republicans from 2016 to 2024. county returns summed; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.

The state in numbers

MeasureStateAverage stateDifference
Bachelor's degree or higher, 25+, 202331.8%34.0%-2.2 pts
White, non-Hispanic, 202373.0%66.3%+6.7 pts
Black, non-Hispanic, 202313.2%10.1%+3.1 pts
Hispanic or Latino, 20235.7%12.9%-7.1 pts
Asian, non-Hispanic, 20233.3%4.4%-1.1 pts
Foreign-born, 20237.0%9.6%-2.6 pts
Median age, 202340.139.1+1.02
Median household income, 2023$71,149$77,633$-6,484
Median home value, 2023$217,600$314,132$-96,532
Owner-occupied homes, 202372.9%67.4%+5.6 pts
Unemployment (ACS), 20235.8%4.8%+1.0 pts
Federal government workers, 20231.6%3.0%-1.4 pts
Work from home, 202312.0%12.3%-0.3 pts
Households on SNAP, 202313.1%11.1%+2.0 pts
Households with Social Security income, 202334.7%32.1%+2.6 pts
Households with public assistance income, 20232.8%2.6%+0.2 pts
Moved in from another state, past year, 20231.4%2.9%-1.4 pts
Gini index, 20230.460.47-0.00
Unemployment, latest month (BLS), 2026-075.4%4.0%+1.4 pts
Change in unemployment, past 12 months, 2026-07-0.4 pts-0.1 pts-0.2 pts
Change since the last election (24 months), 2026-07-0.4 pts-0.1 pts-0.3 pts
Per-capita personal income (BEA), 2024$63,690$70,662$-6,972
Per-capita income growth since 2019, nominal, 202431.1%32.4%-1.3 pts
Government and other transfers, share of income, 202421.8%19.4%+2.4 pts
Social Security, share of income, 20227.6%6.1%+1.5 pts
Medicare, share of income, 20225.2%4.4%+0.9 pts
Medicaid, share of income, 20223.7%3.8%-0.1 pts
SNAP, share of income, 20220.8%0.6%+0.2 pts
Earned Income Tax Credit, share of income, 20220.3%0.3%+0.0 pts
Veterans' benefits, share of income, 20220.7%0.9%-0.2 pts
Federal civilian jobs, share of all jobs, 20220.9%1.5%-0.6 pts
Military jobs, share of all jobs, 20220.3%1.2%-0.9 pts

ACS 5-year state tables; BLS county unemployment and BEA county income, transfers and jobs summed to the state. Every figure is a named column of a named public-domain table, archived before it was read.

Who is ahead, and by how much?

+0.6
NOWCAST
run 08fa5515 · single_race_latent/0.8.1 · as of 2026-10-01
+0.9
ELECTION-DAY
run 163d87e0 · single_race_latent/0.8.1 · as of 2026-10-01

Two numbers because they answer two questions. The nowcast is where opinion stands; the election-day forecast is where it is likely to end up.

How likely is each to win?

55%
Abdul El-Sayed
run 08fa5515 · single_race_latent/0.8.1 · as of 2026-10-01
55%
Abdul El-Sayed
run 163d87e0 · single_race_latent/0.8.1 · as of 2026-10-01

Monte Carlo error is ±0.2 points. A change smaller than that is simulation noise rather than news, and this page will not describe it as movement.

How wide is the range?

Nowcast: 90% of simulations fall between -8.4 and +9.4 points. Election day: -10.0 to +11.8. The election-day interval is 4.0 points wider, which is the 33 days of movement still to come.

What is the uncertainty made of?

Total sd 6.98 points, made of race-specific polling error 51%, drift to election day 33%, correlated polling error 12%, latent opinion 4%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.

What evidence is this built on?

37 polls, most recent 2026-09-30. 21% verified against a primary source.

What changed since the last run?

tied-9+11single_race_latent/0.3.0single_race_latent/0.4.0single_race_latent/0.5.0single_race_latent/0.6.0single_race_latent/0.7.0single_race_latent/0.8.0single_race_latent/0.8.124 Sep1 Oct

Shaded band is the 90% interval, line is the central estimate, positive is Abdul El-Sayed ahead of Douglas P. Marsh. Over 18 stored forecasts the central estimate moved -0.9 points. There were 7 specification changes (marked on the axis) and 3 new polls arrived over this window — so the movement mixes new evidence with changes to the model.

Since 2026-10-01: margin +0.00 points, win probability +0.0 points, on +0 polls.

Not answered here: why it changed. Splitting a move into new polls, time and specification means re-running the earlier model against the later inputs -- two extra posterior fits -- so it is computed on a cadence (scripts/attribute_forecasts.py) rather than while you wait. This pair of runs has not been decomposed yet. The size of the move is shown; the cause is not guessed at.

How has this model done before?

Measured on 230 forecasts across 230 races in cycles 2016,2018,2020,2022,2024: mean absolute error 4.56 points, Brier score 0.0543. The nominal 90% interval contained the result 94% of the time, the 80% interval 84%, and the 50% interval 47%. Read that with care: a national polling miss moves every race in a cycle at once, so the sample size for a question about the intervals is 5 cycle(s), not 230 forecasts. Per cycle -- bias +1.644 pts; 2016: n=43 bias=+4.68 cov90=0.860; 2018: n=63 bias=-0.52 cov90=1.000; 2020: n=35 bias=+5.44 cov90=0.886; 2022: n=54 bias=-0.60 cov90=0.944; 2024: n=35 bias=+1.48 cov90=1.000.

Where did every number come from?

Nowcast run 08fa5515-8732-4bfc-8499-29237e41e26b and election-day run 163d87e0-baea-4788-94ed-c43c5d7dc19c, model single_race_latent/0.8.1 at commit bdf7e83107c17a2399efe61a44ef1bbee48f9284, seeds 20260924 and 20260924.