NH-2 · House
election-day forecast · ground-up model · as of 2026-10-02
The district, in brief
New Hampshire's 2nd encompasses western and northern New Hampshire and includes the cities of Nashua and Concord. The lines are the map first used in 2022 and are not redrawn for this cycle. The facts record a 2024 presidential two-party margin of 3.6 for the Democrat on these lines and a 2024 House two-party margin of 5.97 for the Democrat.
The incumbent is Democrat Maggie Goodlander, elected with 52.9% in 2024, who won her primary 81.8% to 18.0% over state representative Paige Beauchemin. The Republican nominee is Lily Tang Williams, former chair of the Colorado Libertarian Party, the 2024 nominee and a 2022 candidate for this district, and the 2016 Libertarian nominee for U.S. Senate in Colorado; she took 64.9% in her primary. An independent, Robbie Mahrou, is also on the ballot. As of March 31, 2026 Goodlander had raised $2,972,341 with $2,046,131 on hand and Williams $869,483 with $573,929 on hand.
Every rater listed calls the seat D: Decision Desk HQ (July 14, 2026), the Cook Political Report (July 16, 2026), Inside Elections (March 7, 2025) and Sabato's Crystal Ball (July 15, 2025). Eight general-election polls are recorded, all with Goodlander ahead; the most recent, from the University of New Hampshire (September 17–21, 2026), had Goodlander 56%, Williams 35%, and the earliest, Saint Anselm College (August 26–27, 2025), had 49% to 31%.
A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.
The facts, each beside its sentence
The incumbent is Democrat Maggie Goodlander, who was elected with 52.9% of the vote in 2024.
Maggie Goodlander, incumbent U.S. representative
Maggie Goodlander, incumbent U.S. representative
Lily Tang Williams, former chair of the Colorado Libertarian Party, nominee for this district in 2024 and candidate in 2022
Maggie Goodlander, incumbent U.S. representative
Lily Tang Williams, former chair of the Colorado Libertarian Party, nominee for this district in 2024 and candidate in 2022, and Libertarian nominee for U.S. Senate in Colorado in 2016
who was elected with 52.9% of the vote in 2024
candidate: Maggie Goodlander (incumbent) party: Democratic Party (United States) votes: 59,817 percentage: 81.8
Decision Desk HQ D July 14, 2026 The Cook Political Report D July 16, 2026
Maggie Goodlander (D) $2,972,341 $984,208 $2,046,131
University of New Hampshire September 17–21, 2026 702 (LV)
*Robbie Mahrou (Independent) ===General election===
Paige Beauchemin, state representative from the Hillsborough 3rd district (2023–present)
Not in the source: No Silver Bulletin rating is listed, and no rating finer than 'D' is given.; No general-election fundraising table is given; figures are as of March 31, 2026.; The text gives no background for the independent Robbie Mahrou.; The model's basis says no district polls, but the text records eight general-election polls.
Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as 1d36a9ee2f88; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.
Who holds the seat now
Maggie Goodlander (Democrat), in this chamber since 2025, 1 term. Committees: House Committee on Armed Services; House Committee on Veterans' Affairs; House Committee on Small Business.
From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.
How it has voted for president
| Two-party margin | 2016 | 2020 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| President | D+3.6 | D+10.2 | D+5.0 |
A shift of 1.4 points toward the Democrats from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.
Who are the voters?
| Group (adults 25+) | Share of adults | Turnout 2020 / midterm | Share of a midterm electorate | Est. Democratic share, 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White, no degree | 56% | 66% / 50% | 48% | 41% |
| White, degree | 35% | 90% / 77% | 46% | 69% |
| Black | 1% | 20% / 36% | 1% | 93% |
| Hispanic | 3% | 37% / 21% | 1% | 64% |
| Asian | 2% | 30% / 27% | 1% | 69% |
| Other / multiracial | 2% | 72% / 57% | 2% | 64% |
Of about 501,574 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 54.5% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 55.5% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 2.0 points toward Democrats. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.
Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.
The money
| Candidate | Raised | Cash on hand | PAC share | Self-funded | Outside $ for | Outside $ against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodlander, Maggie (DEM) incumbent | $4,155,360 | $2,701,065 | 8% | 0% | $150,000 | $0 |
| Williams, Lily Tang (REP) challenger | $1,199,750 | $627,779 | 0% | 10% | $0 | $0 |
| Orlando, Victor D (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $170,941 | $9,596 | 3% | 92% | $0 | $0 |
| Beauchemin, Paige (DEM) challenger · not on our roster | $43,749 | $4,793 | 0% | 1% | $0 | $0 |
| Kuster, Ann Mclane (DEM) incumbent · not on our roster | $24,641 | $113,542 | 0% | 0% | $0 | $0 |
| Nicholson, Daniel Stephen Mr (REP) challenger · not on our roster | $475 | $160 | 0% | 32% | $0 | $0 |
FEC bulk candidate summaries through August 19, 2026; $150,000 of independent expenditures for or against these candidates this cycle (FEC Schedule E, types 24E and 24A), which is the parties' and outside groups' own revealed view of whether this seat is in play.
The district in numbers
| Measure | District | Nation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bachelor's degree or higher, 25+ | 39.2% | 34.9% | +4.3 pts |
| White, non-Hispanic | 87.7% | 58.2% | +29.5 pts |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 1.3% | 12.0% | -10.6 pts |
| Hispanic or Latino | 4.4% | 19.0% | -14.6 pts |
| Asian, non-Hispanic | 2.6% | 5.8% | -3.2 pts |
| Foreign-born | 6.3% | 13.9% | -7.6 pts |
| Median age | 43.7 | 39.2 | 4.5 |
| Median household income | $93,978 | $84,362 | $+9,616 |
| Median home value | $343,300 | $379,737 | $-36,437 |
| Owner-occupied homes | 73.6% | 65.1% | +8.5 pts |
| Unemployment, July 2026 (BLS county data) | 2.7% | 4.4% | -1.7 pts |
| Change in unemployment, past 12 months | -0.5 pts | — | — |
| Change since the last election (24 months) | -0.1 pts | — | — |
| Unemployment (ACS) | 3.3% | 5.2% | -1.9 pts |
| Federal government workers | 2.1% | 2.6% | -0.5 pts |
| Work from home | 14.7% | 13.5% | +1.3 pts |
| Households on SNAP | 6.0% | 11.8% | -5.8 pts |
| Households with Social Security income | 35.7% | 31.2% | +4.5 pts |
| Households with public assistance income | 2.6% | 2.7% | -0.1 pts |
| Moved in from another state, past year | 3.7% | 2.3% | +1.4 pts |
| Gini index | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
| Per-capita personal income (BEA), 2024 | $80,090 | $73,248 | $+6,842 |
| Per-capita income growth since 2019, nominal, 2024 | 30.6% | 32.0% | -1.4 pts |
| Government and other transfers, share of income, 2024 | 17.3% | 19.6% | -2.2 pts |
| Social Security, share of income, 2022 | 6.6% | 5.8% | +0.7 pts |
| Medicare, share of income, 2022 | 4.0% | 4.5% | -0.5 pts |
| Medicaid, share of income, 2022 | 2.8% | 4.0% | -1.1 pts |
| SNAP, share of income, 2022 | 0.2% | 0.6% | -0.4 pts |
| Earned Income Tax Credit, share of income, 2022 | 0.2% | 0.4% | -0.2 pts |
| Veterans' benefits, share of income, 2022 | 0.8% | 0.9% | -0.1 pts |
| Federal civilian jobs, share of all jobs, 2022 | 1.0% | 1.3% | -0.3 pts |
| Military jobs, share of all jobs, 2022 | 0.4% | 0.9% | -0.5 pts |
ACS 5-year 2023, the Census Bureau's own tabulation of this district (118th Congress lines). Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.
Who is favoured, and by how much?
The 90% interval runs from +5.0 to +32.4 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.
What is this built on?
A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.
Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.
Why does the model say this?
Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: 2024 presidential lean (D+5.1): 5.2 pts toward the Democrat; experience gap (+4 levels, D minus R): 3.2 pts toward the Democrat; PAC money balance: 2.5 pts toward the Democrat; total outside/party money: 2.1 pts toward the Democrat; Democrat's experience (incumbent): 1.3 pts toward the Democrat.
How sure is it, and of what?
Total sd 8.31 points, made of the seat's own volatility 91%, correlated polling error 9%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.
Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.
How was this number made?
Run 6f211e6f-2bdc-4dda-8f72-81fc628dab0b, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).