TX-30 · House
election-day forecast · ground-up model · as of 2026-10-02
The district, in brief
Texas's 30th is a new district for 2026, anchored in the southern portions of Dallas, including South Dallas and Fair Park, and stretching south through Dallas County suburbs such as Lancaster, Duncanville, DeSoto, Wilmer, Cedar Hill and southern Grand Prairie. The text records Kamala Harris at 72.7% in the district in 2024 and Colin Allred at 75.1% in his losing Senate race against Ted Cruz. The seat is open: the previous incumbent, Democrat Jasmine Crockett, was drawn into the 33rd and is running for U.S. Senate.
The Democratic nominee is Frederick Haynes III, a pastor and former president and CEO of Rainbow/PUSH, who won the primary with 72.6% over Barbara Mallory Caraway (23.1%) and Rodney LaBruce (4.3%). Crockett endorsed him, as did Greg Casar, Maxwell Frost, Pramila Jayapal, the Texas AFL-CIO, Justice Democrats, the Dallas Morning News and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, with Giffords and J Street added after the primary. The Republican nominee is Everett Jackson, a business owner, who led the primary with 38.0% and won the runoff 57.5% to 42.5% over attorney Sholdon Daniels. An independent, Oxford Nordberg, has filed paperwork. As of April 26, 2026 Haynes III had raised $347,441 with $124,849 on hand; Jackson had raised $16,948 with $2,406 on hand.
Decision Desk HQ (July 14, 2026), the Cook Political Report (February 6, 2025), Inside Elections (March 7, 2025) and Sabato's Crystal Ball (September 18, 2025) all rate the seat D; the Silver Bulletin row (August 20, 2026) shows no rating.
A paragraph quoting a model forecast from the day this brief was written is omitted; the current forecast is at the top of this page.
The facts, each beside its sentence
Prior to redistricting, the incumbent was Democrat Jasmine Crockett
Crockett was drawn out of the 30th district and into the 33rd and ultimately decided to run for the U.S. Senate.
Frederick Haynes III, pastor and former president and CEO of Rainbow/PUSH
====Nominee==== * Everett Jackson, business owner
Frederick Haynes III, pastor and former president and CEO of Rainbow/PUSH
====Nominee==== * Everett Jackson, business owner
Kamala Harris won 72.7% of the vote in the district in 2024, as did Dallas native Colin Allred who won 75.1% in his losing Senate bid against Ted Cruz.
The new 30th district is anchored in the southern portions of Dallas and encompasses South Dallas and Fair Park, stretching southward to such diverse south Dallas County suburbs as Lancaster, Duncanville, DeSoto, Wilmer, Cedar Hill and southern Grand Prairie.
candidate: Frederick Haynes III votes: 76,701 percentage: 72.6
Decision Desk HQ D July 14, 2026 The Cook Political Report D February 6, 2025
Frederick Haynes III (D) $347,441 $222,592 $124,849
Jasmine Crockett, incumbent U.S. representative from the 30th district (ran for U.S. Senate, endorsed Haynes III)
* Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC * Justice Democrats
candidate: Everett Jackson votes: 4,960 percentage: 57.5
====Filed paperwork==== * Oxford Nordberg, entrepreneur
Not in the source: No district polls are in the text, and the model's basis says no district polls.; The Silver Bulletin rating cell is empty; only its date is given.; No general-election ratings finer than 'D' are given (no Lean/Likely/Safe).; The text gives no biography for Jackson beyond 'business owner' and no endorsements for him in the general election.
Read from the district's section of Wikipedia's state page (CC BY-SA), archived as efe72be7e14a; written by claude-fable-5-1 (batch reader) on 2026-09-30 and checked mechanically: every quote occurs verbatim in the archived text, every number in the brief occurs in the inputs. No probability here is the reader's.
Who holds the seat now
Jasmine Crockett (Democrat), in this chamber since 2023, 2 terms. Committees: House Committee on the Judiciary; House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform; House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021.
From the congress-legislators dataset (CC0), archived as ae8cb9477c48. For a Senate race this lists both of the state's senators; the one whose term ends in the election year holds the seat on the ballot. For a House district redrawn for 2026 it is the member elected under the old lines with this number, who may be running elsewhere; the dossier above names who is running here.
How it has voted for president
| Two-party margin | 2016 | 2020 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| President | D+14.7 | D+20.9 | D+12.3 |
A shift of 2.4 points toward the Republicans from 2016 to 2024. county returns placed on the current lines by 2020 block population; MEDSL county file (2016), an MIT-licensed county file (2020, checked against certified state results) and MEDSL precinct returns (2024). For a district split across counties this is an estimate, and where the state published the exact 2024 figure for these lines, that exact figure is the one the model uses.
Who are the voters?
| Group (adults 25+) | Share of adults | Turnout 2020 / midterm | Share of a midterm electorate | Est. Democratic share, 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White, no degree | 12% | 62% / 44% | 14% | 19% |
| White, degree | 6% | 84% / 68% | 11% | 67% |
| Black | 45% | 56% / 39% | 48% | 97% |
| Hispanic | 30% | 38% / 26% | 22% | 78% |
| Asian | 5% | 39% / 28% | 3% | 87% |
| Other / multiracial | 2% | 55% / 40% | 2% | 75% |
Of about 480,075 adults 25 and over. In 2020 the district voted 78.5% Democratic (two-party) for president. With the same preferences and a 2022-style midterm turnout, it would vote 78.2% Democratic: the midterm electorate alone moves the margin 0.6 points toward Republicans. Group shares are estimated from how results vary across the state's census tracts (ecological inference, anchored to Pew's 2020 validated-voter figures) and calibrated to this district's actual 2020 vote; turnout is the Census survey's state rate by race and national rate by education, whose state samples carry margins of several points.
Not answered here: how each group will vote in 2026. These are 2020 preferences; this profile is description, not yet an input to the forecast.
The money
| Candidate | Raised | Cash on hand | PAC share | Self-funded | Outside $ for | Outside $ against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crockett, Jasmine (DEM) incumbent · not on our roster | $8,056,948 | $83,553 | 2% | 0% | $270,000 | $0 |
| Haynes, Frederick Iii (DEM) open seat · not on our roster | $420,153 | $119,776 | 11% | 0% | $200,000 | $0 |
| Daniels, Sholdon (REP) open seat · not on our roster | $357,415 | $-21,795 | 0% | 1% | $0 | $0 |
| Heise, Gregor Heinrich (REP) open seat · not on our roster | $174,885 | $254 | 0% | 23% | $0 | $0 |
| Mallory Caraway, Barbara (DEM) open seat · not on our roster | $20,148 | $-1,286 | 0% | 21% | $0 | $0 |
| Mallory Caraway, Barbara (DEM) open seat · not on our roster | $20,148 | $-1,286 | 0% | 21% | $0 | $0 |
| Jackson, Everett Honorable (REP) open seat | $17,215 | $1,159 | 0% | 1% | $0 | $0 |
| Labruce, Rodney (DEM) open seat · not on our roster | $5,520 | $3,125 | 0% | 57% | $0 | $0 |
| Reazor, Stephani (REP) open seat · not on our roster | $1,606 | $0 | 0% | 0% | $0 | $0 |
FEC bulk candidate summaries through September 30, 2026; $470,000 of independent expenditures for or against these candidates this cycle (FEC Schedule E, types 24E and 24A), which is the parties' and outside groups' own revealed view of whether this seat is in play.
The district in numbers
| Measure | District | Nation | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bachelor's degree or higher, 25+ | 24.2% | 34.9% | -10.8 pts |
| White, non-Hispanic | 14.7% | 58.2% | -43.5 pts |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 42.3% | 12.0% | +30.3 pts |
| Hispanic or Latino | 36.2% | 19.0% | +17.2 pts |
| Asian, non-Hispanic | 3.8% | 5.8% | -1.9 pts |
| Foreign-born | 18.5% | 13.9% | +4.6 pts |
| Median age | 34.6 | 39.2 | -4.6 |
| Median household income | $73,218 | $84,362 | $-11,143 |
| Median home value | $238,699 | $379,737 | $-141,038 |
| Owner-occupied homes | 58.6% | 65.1% | -6.5 pts |
| Unemployment, July 2026 (BLS county data) | 4.7% | 4.4% | +0.3 pts |
| Change in unemployment, past 12 months | +0.4 pts | — | — |
| Change since the last election (24 months) | +0.2 pts | — | — |
| Unemployment (ACS) | 6.4% | 5.2% | +1.2 pts |
| Federal government workers | 3.2% | 2.6% | +0.6 pts |
| Work from home | 10.4% | 13.5% | -3.0 pts |
| Households on SNAP | 16.5% | 11.8% | +4.8 pts |
| Households with Social Security income | 24.4% | 31.2% | -6.8 pts |
| Households with public assistance income | 3.1% | 2.7% | +0.5 pts |
| Moved in from another state, past year | 1.1% | 2.3% | -1.2 pts |
| Gini index | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
| Per-capita personal income (BEA), 2024 | $79,907 | $73,248 | $+6,659 |
| Per-capita income growth since 2019, nominal, 2024 | 33.1% | 32.0% | +1.1 pts |
| Government and other transfers, share of income, 2024 | 11.8% | 19.6% | -7.8 pts |
| Social Security, share of income, 2022 | 3.4% | 5.8% | -2.5 pts |
| Medicare, share of income, 2022 | 3.0% | 4.5% | -1.5 pts |
| Medicaid, share of income, 2022 | 2.2% | 4.0% | -1.8 pts |
| SNAP, share of income, 2022 | 0.5% | 0.6% | -0.1 pts |
| Earned Income Tax Credit, share of income, 2022 | 0.4% | 0.4% | +0.0 pts |
| Veterans' benefits, share of income, 2022 | 0.5% | 0.9% | -0.3 pts |
| Federal civilian jobs, share of all jobs, 2022 | 1.0% | 1.3% | -0.3 pts |
| Military jobs, share of all jobs, 2022 | 0.2% | 0.9% | -0.7 pts |
ACS 5-year 2023, assembled from census tracts by the 2020 population of their blocks inside the current lines, because the Bureau has not tabulated these lines; medians are population-weighted means of tract medians. Unemployment is the BLS county series placed on the district by block population, not seasonally adjusted, so changes are same-month comparisons. Income, transfers and jobs are BEA county accounts placed the same way, compared with the average district. Every other figure is a named column of a named table in the Bureau's summary file, archived before it was read. This is what a reader knows about a district before looking at a poll; the model does not yet use it, and whether it should is a registered question.
Who is favoured, and by how much?
The 90% interval runs from +30.1 to +60.4 points, D-R. It is wide because this district has never been polled.
What is this built on?
A model trained on every contested House race 2012-2024 predicts this district's lean from its own record: presidential and House results on the current lines, incumbency, both candidates' prior offices, outside and party money before 1 October, demographics and public-assistance shares from the Census release before the election, local unemployment and income, and religious tradition. The national margin comes from presidential approval, the economy, the midterm penalty and the generic ballot corrected for its measured lean. Draws share national and state errors, so the seat total and this district come from the same simulation.
Not answered here: district polls, which are not yet folded in.
Why does the model say this?
Each figure is how far this district's predicted lean moves when that one feature is set to the typical value across 2026 districts, everything else held: 2024 presidential lean (D+49.3): 36.7 pts toward the Democrat; 2024 House lean: 10.3 pts toward the Democrat; PAC money balance: 9.3 pts toward the Democrat; 2020 presidential lean (D+52.8): 3.4 pts toward the Democrat; 2022 House lean: 2.1 pts toward the Democrat.
How sure is it, and of what?
Total sd 9.23 points, made of the seat's own volatility 92%, correlated polling error 8%. The decomposition is stored with the forecast rather than reconstructed, so a probability whose dominant input is a placeholder is visibly that.
Not answered here: a nowcast. 'If ballots were cast today' needs something that observes today, and for a House district nothing does. Publishing the election-day figure under both labels would make one forecast look like two.
How was this number made?
Run 00a09d4b-7980-4ec5-ada0-077968a87242, house_district_prior/0.2.0, as of 2026-10-02. Promoted by a pre-registered gate: on 2016-2022 its Brier score was 0.036 against 0.049 for the previous method, and on a single 2024 run 0.023 against 0.032 (experiments/district_gate_result.md, with an independent review).